Automated assessment of tDCS electrode placement accuracy based on structural MRI
Straub, S.; Schöpfer, R.; Godehardt, S.; Wüthrich, F.; Peter, J.
Show abstract
PurposeAccurate electrode placement is essential for studies using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) since it determines whether - and to which extent - the intended brain region was modulated. Precise electrode placement also reduces between-subject variability. Using in-scanner tDCS, accuracy and precision of electrode placement can be determined. Previous studies manually segmented electrode positions from structural MRI, a process that is time-consuming and prone to error. We therefore developed an algorithm that automatedly extracts electrode coordinates from structural MRI. MethodsWe applied this algorithm to 49 datasets acquired at diferent field strengths (3 T and 7 T), with two image resolutions and electrode montages (bifrontal or ring-shaped) targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We validated its accuracy by comparing the automatedly extracted coordinates with manual annotations from two independent readers. We then used the actual and intended electrode coordinates to simulate how electrode placement deviations influenced the resulting electric field. ResultsFor all setups and scanners, the median localization error of the algorithm was 2.3 mm. It was within 1 mm of the variability between human readers (2.7 mm), indicating human-level reliability. Large deviations (> 20 mm) from intended positions led to substantial changes in the electric field - up to 35% for the ring-shaped montage -highlighting the need for placement verification in tDCS studies. ConclusionThe proposed algorithm obviates the need for manual electrode segmentation and allows an objective evaluation of electrode placement accuracy and precision for in-scanner tDCS. It may be used to relate electrode position errors to stimulation efects, thereby supporting reproducible tDCS research.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of tDCS Dose and Electrode Montage on regional cerebral blood flow and motor behavior 96%
- Glutamate-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (GluCEST) Detects Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Motor Cortex 96%
- A Systematic Review and Large-Scale tES and TMS Electric Field Modeling Study Reveals How Outcome Measure Selection Alters Results in a Person- and Montage-Specific Manner 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 95%
- Group and Individual Level Variations between Symmetric and Asymmetric DLPFC Montages for tDCS over Large Scale Brain Network Nodes 95%
- Probabilistic comparison of gray and white matter coverage between depth and surface intracranial electrodes in epilepsy: a patient-specific modeling and empirical study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of fMRI presurgical mapping techniques with intraoperative brain mapping-based validation 94%
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 94%
- Source Reconstruction Without an MRI using Optically Pumped Magnetometer based Magnetoencephalography 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.