Back

hypeR-GEM: connecting metabolite signatures to enzyme-coding genes via genome-scale metabolic models

Huang, Z.; Sebastiani, P.; Segre, D.; Monti, S.

2025-12-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2025.12.08.692998 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Enrichment analysis is a cornerstone of "omics" data interpretation, enabling researchers to connect analysis results to biological processes and generate testable hypotheses. While well-established tools exist for transcriptomics and other omics layers, the development of robust enrichment resources for metabolomics remains comparatively limited. To address this gap, we developed hypeR-GEM, a methodology and associated R package that adapts gene set enrichment analysis to metabolomics. hypeR-GEM leverages genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) to infer reaction-based links between metabolites and enzyme-coding genes, enabling the mapping of metabolite signatures to gene signatures and their subsequent annotation via gene set enrichment analysis. We validated hypeR-GEM using paired metabolomics-proteomics and metabolomics-transcriptomics datasets by assessing whether genes mapped from metabolites significantly overlapped with differentially expressed proteins or transcripts. We further evaluated whether pathways enriched via hypeR-GEM-mapped genes corresponded to those derived from paired proteomic or transcriptomic data. In most datasets analyzed, both the predicted enzyme-coding genes and the associated enriched pathways showed significant concordance with independently derived omics signatures, supporting the utility and robustness of hypeR-GEM. Finally, we applied hypeR-GEM to the analysis of age-associated metabolic signatures from the New England Centenarian Study. The results revealed consistent enrichment of lipid-related pathways, aligning with the well-established role of lipid metabolism in aging, and highlighted additional pathways not captured in the metabolites annotation, demonstrating hypeR-GEMs practical utility in a real-world use case.

Published in Bioinformatics (predicted rank #9) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.