Back
#1
24.0%
Top 2%
19.1%
Top 0.7%
9.7%
Top 0.6%
6.9%
Top 2%
6.4%
Top 61%
4.5%
Top 3%
2.1%
Top 2%
2.1%
Top 2%
2.1%
Top 19%
2.1%
Top 2%
1.7%
Top 3%
1.4%
Top 6%
1.0%
Top 15%
1.0%
Top 3%
1.0%
Top 5%
0.8%
Top 4%
0.8%
Top 7%
0.8%
Top 3%
0.8%
Top 99%
0.8%
Top 16%
0.8%
Combining MAVEs and computational predictors improves variant classification across ancestries in hereditary cancer genes
2025-12-09
genetic and genomic medicine
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
Many commonly used computational tools for variant effect prediction exhibit ancestry-related bias because they are trained on clinical or population datasets that under-represent global diversity, leading to uneven and sometimes unfair variant classification across ancestries. Multiplexed assays of variant effect (MAVEs) and population-free VEPs instead offer alternatives that are unbiased with respect to human ancestry, providing classification evidence that generalises across populations. Her...
Predicted journal destinations
1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
77 training papers
2
Nature Communications
483 training papers
3
Nature Genetics
72 training papers
4
Genome Medicine
56 training papers
5
Genetics in Medicine
57 training papers
6
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
7
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
39 training papers
8
PLOS Genetics
39 training papers
9
Cell Genomics
34 training papers
10
eLife
262 training papers
11
Nature
58 training papers
12
European Journal of Human Genetics
25 training papers
13
Human Molecular Genetics
28 training papers
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
100 training papers
15
Journal of Medical Genetics
22 training papers
16
npj Genomic Medicine
18 training papers
17
Genes
21 training papers
18
Frontiers in Genetics
32 training papers
19
Bioinformatics
24 training papers
20
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
21
Nature Medicine
88 training papers