Back

High-resolution insights into the geographic differentiation and hybridisation of Odontobutis gobies through integrated eDNA and SNP analyses

Tsuji, S.; Miuchi, Y.; Shibata, N.; Watanabe, K.

2025-12-06 molecular biology
10.64898/2025.12.05.692706 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding fine-scale population genetic structure is essential for biodiversity conservation and evolutionary research, but conventional phylogeographic studies often face labour and financial cost constraints. This study proposes a two-step survey strategy that integrates environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis and PCR-based genome-wide SNP genotyping, aiming to evaluate its effectiveness by comprehensively characterising the population structure of widely distributed species. As a model system, we selected the odontobutid gobies, Odontobutis obscurus and O. hikimius, which occur in western Japan. Initially, water samples were collected from 335 sites across western Japan. Subsequently, tissue sampling for SNP analysis was conducted at 49 sites representing the regional groups and species. The eDNA analysis revealed two major mitochondrial clades within O. obscurus, each comprising multiple geographically distinct groups. Subsequently, tissue sampling and SNP analysis were conducted at representative sites of each regional group and species. Nuclear genomic SNP data (661 loci) corroborated the deep divergence between the two clades of O. obscurus and, unexpectedly, indicated that O. hikimius, whose range lies at their boundary, originated through hybridisation between them. Geographic patterns of the regional groups inferred from both mitochondrial and nuclear data were largely explained by historical geological events such as mountain uplift and ancient river system dynamics, and provide unprecedentedly detailed insight into the population structuring of the focal species. This study demonstrates that the integration of eDNA and SNP analyses provides a cost-effective and scalable approach for high-resolution phylogeographic surveys.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
24.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
5
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
8
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
9
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
10
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
11
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
12
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
13
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
16
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
17
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
18
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
21
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
22
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
25
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%