Back

Shaft versus spine localization affects the structural plasticity of glutamatergic synapses

Fanutza, T.; Popp, Y.; Brueckner, A. M.; Hertrich, N.; Sivers, J. v.; Larkum, M. E.; Shoichet, S. A.; Mikhaylova, M.

2025-12-09 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.05.692591 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the early stages of development, most excitatory synapses are formed directly on dendritic shafts. As neurons mature, these sites gradually shift from the shaft to dendritic spines. In fully developed excitatory neurons, the majority of glutamatergic postsynaptic sites containing the postsynaptic density (PSD) molecules reside on dendritic spines. However, some glutamatergic synapses remain as shaft synapses, yet their characteristics have remained unexplored. Here, we show that the molecular composition of the shaft PSDs closely resembles that of spine PSDs. Key components such as AMPARs, NMDARs, CaV1.2 channels, and F-actin interacting proteins, SynGAP, as well as cortactin, are present in comparable amounts in both synapse types. The major distinction between shaft and spine PSDs lies in the lower abundance of the scaffold proteins Shanks and Homer in shaft PSDs. Shaft synapses are not merely passive structures but actively participate in synaptic transmission. Their structure and function are modulated by changes in neuronal activity. Long-term live imaging combined with a cLTP protocol revealed that shaft PSDs were potentiated but rarely underwent a transition to spine synapses. In contrast, during LTD, shaft PSDs were eliminated more frequently than their spine counterparts. Together, these findings highlight excitatory shaft synapses as a distinct, and notably less stable, synapse type.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.8%
2
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.5%
5
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
6
Molecular Brain
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Molecular Neurobiology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
11
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
15
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
17
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.5%
19
Glia
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Journal of Comparative Neurology
73 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Journal of Neurochemistry
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
28
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%