Optimal deployment of gonorrhoea point-of-care tests: modelling the potential impact of diagnostic confirmation testing and screening strategies across five priority populations in Kenya
Michalow, J.; Cori, A.; Kimani, J.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Boily, M.-C.; Imai-Eaton, J. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundGonorrhoea treatment in sub-Saharan Africa relies on syndromic management, which has poor diagnostic performance and misses asymptomatic infections. Point-of-care tests (POCTs) could address these limitations, but anticipated supply constraints necessitate strategic allocation to maximise impact. MethodsWe developed a deterministic compartmental model of gonorrhoea transmission in Kenya to evaluate allocating POCTs for diagnostic confirmation of symptomatic care attendees versus screening of routine healthcare service attendees across five priority populations: female sex workers (FSW), their male clients (CFSW), pregnant women, adolescent girls and young women, or total population men. We modelled constrained and unrestricted POCT availability during 2025-2030, and estimated infections averted relative to baseline syndromic management. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were quantified using probability-tree models. ResultsAt baseline, incidence was highest among FSW (11.9 [UI:5.7-18.6] per 100 per year) and CFSW (13.1 [6.9-24.8]), while most QALY losses (80.6% [76.1-83.8%]) were among pregnant women and their infants. With constrained POCTs (sufficient to test 0.1% of adults annually), diagnostic confirmation averted the most transmission when among symptomatic FSW (2.1% [0.6-5.6%] of infections) or CFSW (2.2% [0.8-5.3%]), but the most morbidity was averted when among symptomatic pregnant women (3.5% [1.8-7.2%] of QALY losses). Screening averted <1% of infections or QALY losses across populations. With unrestricted POCTs, screening had larger absolute impacts but lower per-test returns than diagnostic confirmation. ConclusionsDiagnostic confirmation should be prioritised over screening, supporting WHO guidance to strengthen aetiologic diagnosis within syndromic management. Prioritising diagnostic testing among symptomatic pregnant women had the largest impact on mitigating gonorrhoea-related morbidity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies for using antigen rapid diagnostic tests to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in low- and middle-income countries: a mathematical modelling study applied to Zambia 93%
- Forecasting trachoma control and identifying transmission-hotspots 93%
- Improving the cost efficiency of preventive chemotherapy: impact of new diagnostics on stopping decisions for control of schistosomiasis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying the role of household immunity in driving individual dengue virus infection risk 91%
- Antimicrobial exposure in sexual networks drives divergent evolution in modern gonococci 90%
- Dynamics of gut mucosal colonisation with extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales in Malawi 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of public health strategies for COVID-19 epidemic control in South Africa: a microsimulation modelling study 95%
- Population size, HIV prevalence, and antiretroviral therapy coverage among key populations in sub-Saharan Africa: collation and synthesis of survey data 2010-2023 94%
- A Healthcare Service Delivery and Epidemiological Model for Investigating Resource Allocation for Health: The Thanzi La Onse Model 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of screening with transcriptional signatures for incipient TB among U.S. migrants 93%
- The impact of geographic targeting of oral cholera vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa: a modeling study 92%
- Long term vaccination strategies to mitigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a modelling study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.