Back

Peripheral magnetic stimulation of the upper-limb nerves: evoked sensations, phantom-pain relief, and cortical responses

Grigoreva, O.; Samsonov, T.; Dolgoarshinnaia, A.; Lebedev, M.; Soghoyan, G.

2025-12-05 pain medicine
10.64898/2025.12.05.25341696
Show abstract

Peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) is a noninvasive technique applicable to post-stroke rehabilitation, treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP) and generating neuroprosthetic sensations. Here we aimed to test whether PMS could be utilized to enable sensory feedback from hand prostheses and suppress PLP. Accordingly, we induced somatic sensations with PMS and conducted EEG measurements to assess sensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in 30 able-bodied participants (controls) and 11 individuals with transradial amputation. Single PMS pulses of varying amplitude were applied to the left arm locations overlying the median, radial, and ulnar nerves. Subjective accounts of sensations were collected using PerceptMapper, the University of Pittsburghs multitouch interface. After the best location for PMS was found, continuous stimulation (20 or 40 Hz, delivered in 5-min blocks with 5-7 min interblock intervals for patricipant breaks and EEG setup checks) was applied. The control participants reported experiencing sensations in their hands. The amputees felt sensations in their phantom hands. PMS evoked SEPs in both the controls and amputees. The analysis of intertrial coherence showed significant phase consistency of the stimulus-locked EEG responses across trials for the controls and amputees. The measurements of visual analogue scale (VAS) scale showed that PMS did not change PLP in 2 participants, increased it in 4, and decreased in 3. We propose that PMS could be used to assess the effects of peripheral nerve stimulation on somatic sensations, PLP and cortical activity prior to the surgical placement of electrode implants. Significance StatementPeople with amputation have two critical needs: (1) their prosthetic limbs being augmented with naturalistic somatic sensations, and (2) their PLP, which develops in the majority of cases, being suppressed. Electrical stimulation with peripheral nerve implants offers a solution for both needs, but invasiveness of this procedure poses a number of problems. Here we show that PMS offers a noninvasive tool for testing the effects of peripheral nerve stimulation before any invasive implants are placed. PMS causes somatic sensations, modulates PLP and evokes cortical responses evident in EEG recordings. These effects of PMS were documented in both healthy controls and amputees. The results suggest that PMS combined with EEG measurements could serve as tools for testing potential implantation sites.

Matching journals

1
Pain
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.3%
109× avg
2
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
#1
183× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 40%
12.7%
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 29 published papers
#1
72× avg
5
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 15%
2.1× avg
6
Cerebral Cortex
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
#1
112× avg
7
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.2%
55× avg
8
Journal of Neural Engineering
IOP Publishing · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.9%
23× avg
9
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.7%
32× avg
10
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 3%
7.6× avg
11
Brain Sciences
MDPI AG · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.5%
23× avg
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
13
Brain Stimulation
Elsevier BV · based on 27 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
Elsevier BV · based on 77 published papers
Top 7%
2.0× avg
15
Brain
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 69 published papers
Top 7%
2.1× avg
16
Journal of Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
Top 4%
6.1× avg
17
Stroke
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 3%
3.1× avg
18
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
4.7× avg
19
Scientific Data
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 30 published papers
Top 4%
4.5× avg
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 16%
0.7%
21
Cell Reports
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg
22
Neurology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 38 published papers
Top 7%
2.5× avg
23
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 44%
0.7%
24
Communications Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 63 published papers
Top 4%
3.9× avg