Enhanced Detection Rate of AI for Lung Cancer Detection on GP-Referred Chest X-rays: A Real-World Retrospective Evaluation
Datta, A.; Rozwadowski, P.; Broadhurst, P.; Evison, M.; Sharman, A.; Bramley, R.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo assess whether an artificial intelligence (AI) chest radiograph (CXR) tool could enhance lung cancer detection on primary care-referred CXRs in the UK, and to estimate the magnitude of any improvement. MethodsFrom [~]280,000 primary care-referred CXRs, we identified 1,600 linked to a lung cancer diagnosis (ICD-10 C34) within six months. Missed lung cancers were defined by review of the CXR report and comparison of diagnostic CT and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with the index CXR by three specialist radiology clinicians. CXRs with a retrospectively visible but initially missed cancer were re-analysed using a commercially available AI tool. The primary outcome was the enhanced detection rate (EDR), defined as the proportion of confirmed cancers missed on CXR but correctly identified by AI. ResultsOf 1,600 CXRs, 105 (6.6%) contained a retrospectively visible cancer that had been missed at first report. AI flagged abnormalities in 72/105 (69%) and delineated the primary tumour in 38/105 (36%). This equated to an absolute EDR of 2.4% and a relative EDR of 2.9%. Missed lesions were concentrated in central and upper zones, whereas AI detections were more frequent in peripheral locations. ConclusionsAI identified over one-third of retrospectively visible lung cancers that were missed at initial CXR reporting. Implementation as decision support could provide a modest but potentially meaningful increase in lung cancer detection in primary care. Advances in knowledgeIn this large real-world UK study, AI modestly improved lung cancer detection on CXR, with complementary detection patterns to human readers, but performance remained limited in anatomically complex regions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 91%
- Organizing Pneumonia of COVID-19: Time-dependent Evolution and Outcome in CT Findings 90%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comparison of CXR-CAD Software to Radiologists in Identifying COVID-19 in Individuals Evaluated for Sars CoV 2 Infection in Malawi and Zambia 93%
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Detecting Signs of Tuberculosis on Chest Radiographs among US-bound Immigrants and Refugees 93%
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Point-of-care lung ultrasonography for early identification of mild COVID-19: a prospective cohort of outpatients in a Swiss screening center 92%
- Chest X-Ray Has Poor Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Significance in COVID-19: A Propensity Matched Database Study 91%
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.