Back

Dissecting Agronomically Favorable Genotypes in Temperate Japonica Rice via Haplotype Analysis of a Japan-MAGIC Population

Fukuda, H.; Fukuda, A.; Sakamoto, T.; Kawahara, Y.; Naito, K.; Kawakatsu, T.; Yonemaru, J.-i.; Ogawa, D.

2025-12-08 genomics
10.64898/2025.12.04.692267 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LICrop breeding assembles genomic variants into cultivars via crossing and selection. Phenotypic selection has improved yield and lodging tolerance but has limited genetic insights. We show how specific genomic variants and their combinations underpin advances in modern rice breeding in Japan. C_LIO_LIThrough genome-wide association study using a multi-parent advanced-generation intercross population derived from four temperate japonica cultivars, we identified 11 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for key agronomic traits, including days to heading, shoot biomass, panicle length, and culm length under field conditions. GA20ox1, GA20ox2, and Hd1 were among the QTLs, and their natural variants were well conserved in temperate japonica cultivars bred in Japan, underscoring distinct selection pressures at these loci. C_LIO_LIBy integrating genotype data with 5-year yield-performance-evaluation trials of elite cultivars, we found that cultivars carrying multiple-copy GA20ox1 and functional Hd1, together with non-functional ga20ox2, tended to have shorter culms and higher grain yield than cultivars with multiple-copy GA20ox1, functional Hd1, and GA20ox2. This yield advantage was consistent across latitudes in Japan. C_LIO_LIThese results reveal favorable genotype combinations underlying modern japonica improvement and provide a genomic framework for breeding semi-dwarf, high-yielding cultivars adapted to temperate rice-growing regions in Asia. C_LI

Published in The Plant Journal (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.