Back

A single-nucleus multimodal framework reveals epigenomic priming of chemoresistant states in ovarian cancer

Landais, Y.; Bertorello, J.; Puerto, M.; Kahn, A.; Simon, B.; Roehrig, A.; Durand, A.; Quatredeniers, M.; Lamy, C.; Delville, M.; Richard, M.; Laas, E.; Pouget, N.; Dumas, S.; Feron, J.-G.; Fourchotte, V.; Bonneau, C.; Cockenpot, V.; Kamal, M.; Lecuru, F.; Le Tourneau, C.; Vallot, C.

2025-12-08 cancer biology
10.64898/2025.12.04.692102 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Non-genetic intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) drives therapeutic failure in cancer, yet its clinical monitoring remains challenging. We develop a multimodal single-nucleus framework that simultaneously profiles transcriptional and histone modification landscapes from frozen biopsies. Applied to longitudinal samples from 16 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), this approach reveals reproducible tumor evolution under chemotherapy: proliferative and interferon-responsive states are lost, while those associated with TNF- and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) expand. Chromatin profiling shows that these chemoresistant programs are epigenetically primed through H3K4me1 marks before treatment and nominates transcription-factor drivers, including ZBTB7A. Non-genetic baseline tumor composition predicts survival, and fibroblast remodeling parallels malignant adaptation. These findings establish a clinically scalable strategy for mapping functional ITH and identify epigenomic priming as a determinant of therapeutic failure. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=181 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/692102v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (37K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@432524org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3b7843org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@54a2eforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@95273d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.