Back

Alternative probe chemistries for single-molecule analysis of long non-coding RNA

Pai, K. R.; Martin, A. M.; Widom, J. R.

2025-12-06 biophysics
10.64898/2025.12.04.691911 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-molecule microscopy has been widely used to study the structure and dynamics of RNA, but extension to larger systems such as long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) has proven challenging. Methods such as single-molecule kinetic analysis of RNA transient structure (SiM-KARTS), where the binding of a short, complementary oligonucleotide probe is used to determine accessibility of a specific region of the RNA, are promising. However, adapting SiM-KARTS to systems as complex as lncRNA requires careful optimization of experimental variables that have not been thoroughly explored. In this work, SiM-KARTS, thermal denaturation experiments, and circular dichroism spectroscopy were used to analyze the binding behaviors of probes with alternative backbone chemistries, specifically DNA with locked nucleic acid (LNA) residues incorporated and morpholinos. A segment of lncRNA that enabled control over the accessibility of the target sequence was used as a model. We show that optimizing probe backbone chemistry can allow for a more precise distinction between different structures of the target RNA, and for fine-tuning of probe binding stability without the structural impacts that other variables such as ionic concentration may have. Specifically, we demonstrate that LNA probes exhibit a high degree of structural sensitivity in both their binding and unbinding kinetics. We further show that when binding and unbinding rates are considered holistically, LNA probes allow traces arising from different target RNA structures to be individually classified with a high degree of accuracy. These results provide design principles for the application of SiM-KARTS to target RNAs of increased complexity such as lncRNA.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.5%
2
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
9
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
10
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
14
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
20
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
23
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
25
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%