Back

Multiomic characterization, early detection, and therapeutic targeting of myeloid sarcoma

Nadorp, B.; Lasry, A.; Loghavi, S.; Patel, R.; Mansour, H.; Kelly, B. J.; Walker, C. J.; Buss, J.; Boateng, I.; Al-Santli, W.; Ciantra, Z.; Austin, R.; Heyrosa, A.; Desai, H.; Laganson, A.; Abaza, H.; Procell, L.; Patel, T.; Kaffenberger, B.; Wijeratne, S.; Guillamot, M.; Velegraki, M.; Chiriboga, L.; Li, Z.; Abruzzo, L.; Pollyea, D.; McMahon, C.; Shanaah, A.; Byrd, J.; Shih, A.; Levine, R.; Papapetrou, E.; Tsirigos, A.; Mardis, E.; Mims, A.; Aifantis, I.; Eisfeld, A.-K.

2025-12-05 cancer biology
10.64898/2025.12.04.689069 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Myeloid sarcoma, an aggressive extramedullary subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), occurs in [~]10% of patients, and has not yet been included in large-scale genomic studies. The critical biological changes that drive tumor evolution are unknown, its detection in asymptomatic patients remains a clinical challenge, and treatment options are limited as patients are often excluded from clinical trials, rendering it a neglected disease entity. Based on comprehensive multi-omic profiling, we demonstrate that myeloid sarcoma evolves from medullary AML with distinct sitespecific clonal evolution patterns. Additionally, we show that circulating tumor DNA sequencing can serve as a non-invasive method for molecular profiling of myeloid sarcoma, offering a novel avenue in molecular diagnostics. We characterize unique transcriptional profiles of myeloid sarcoma, reflecting immune evasion and adaptation to an extramedullary microenvironment. We provide evidence for a key role of RAS pathway activation and demonstrate in murine models of myeloid sarcoma that RAS inhibition effectively reduces tumor burden. Overall, our data highlight key differences between medullary AML and myeloid sarcoma including universal molecular evolution and RAS pathway activation as hallmarks of the disease and nominate RAS inhibition as a promising therapeutic strategy for patients with myeloid sarcoma.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.6%
2
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.7%
3
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.4%
5
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
7
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
9
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
10
Journal of Experimental Medicine
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
Cell Stem Cell
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.4%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
21
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
23
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%