Combining genome-wide polygenic scores with registry data for colorectal cancer risk-based screening
Krogh Nohr, A.; Giehm Overby, M.; Munk Nielsen, M.; Hedegaard Jensen, R.; Ostergaard Poulsen, L.; Thorlacius-Ussing, O.; Ladefoged Rasmussen, S.; Andersen, B.; Göogenur, I.; Sorensen, E.; Birger Vesterager Pedersen, O.; Erikstrup, C.; Brons, N.; Schwinn, M.; Mikkelsen, C.; Topholm Bruun, M.; Moller Jorgensen, M.; Anders Bertelsen, C.; Georg Hillingso, J.; Hogdall, E.; Rye Ostrowski, S.; DBDS Genomic Consortium, ; DCB Research Consortium, ; Bogsted, M.; Brondum, R. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundAggregating effects of common genetic variants into a polygenic risk score (PRS) has shown potential for risk-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, its utility must be evaluated in ancestrally diverse populations with diverse tumor characteristics and compared to the current screening standard, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). ObjectiveEvaluate the utility of PRS for risk-based CRC screening. DesignThe cohort included 112,204 individuals from the Copenhagen Hospital Biobank (8,995 with adenoma and 9,246 with CRC), all with linked genetic and health registry data. A subset (N=20,658) also had available FIT results. CRC PRSs were evaluated for their association with lifetime adenoma and CRC risk and their predictive value individually and combined with FIT. ResultsPRS stratified population-calibrated lifetime adenoma and CRC risk independently of ancestry and sex. Incidence curves showed that individuals with a high PRS reached the incidence levels of low-PRS individuals around 10 years earlier, between ages 45 to 60. PRS also stratified risk across tumor location and histology but showed no association among individuals with deficient mismatch repair tumors (N=623). Predictive modeling indicated that combing PRS with FIT did not meaningfully improve prediction of adenoma or CRC at first screening, negative colonoscopy outcomes among FIT-positive participants, or adenoma or CRC occurrence within two years after a negative FIT. ConclusionPRS effectively stratifies lifetime adenoma and CRC risk and shows promise for guiding risk-based screening initiation and intensity. When combined with FIT, it adds limited additional predictive value.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for eight common cancers revealed from a phenome-wide Mendelian randomisation analysis of 378,142 cases and 485,715 controls 94%
- Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction 94%
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer: 2,094 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 97%
- Hereditary haemochromatosis beyond liver cancer: increased risk of prostate cancer during an 11-year follow-up 94%
- Causal effects of breast cancer risk factors across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating cancer risk in carriers of Lynch syndrome variants in UK Biobank 95%
- Heritable genetic variants in key cancer genes link cancer risk with anthropometric traits 93%
- A Comprehensive Epithelial Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Genetic and Epidemiological Risk Factors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.