Back

Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment of pretomanid in rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis patients

Nyang'wa, B.-T.; Motta, I.; Moodliar, R.; Solodovnikova, V.; Rajaram, S.; Rasool, M.; Berry, C.; Huang, Z.; Davies, G. R.; Moore, D.; Kloprogge, F.

2025-12-05 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2025.12.04.25341619 medRxiv
Show abstract

Pretomanid is a key component of the bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid with or without moxifloxacin (BPaL/M)regimen recommended for treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB). To support dose optimization and efficacy interpretation, we developed a pretomanid population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and evaluated exposure and probability of target attainment (PTA). Ninety-four RR-TB patients received daily oral pretomanid at 200 mg, and plasma samples were collected at multiple time points. Pretomanid concentrations were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and PK modeling was performed using nlmixr2 in R. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination, and fat free mass allometric scaling best described the data. Typical clearance was 3.10 L/h, median AUC2 was 63,733 g{middle dot}h/L, and median trough concentration was 1,965 g/L. Pretomanid MICs for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the TB-PRACTECAL trial were consistently below the provisional critical concentration, with a median of 0.125 mg/L. PK-Pharmacodynamic (PD) simulations indicated that nearly all participants achieved drug exposures exceeding %fT>MIC, supporting the regimens efficacy across the study population. We developed a pretomanid population PK model and facilitated exploring robust PK-PD targets for PTA that remain valuable to support dose optimisation. There is an urgent need for further research to identify the optimal clinically relevant PK-PD index for pretomanid, especially within the context of combination therapy.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
6
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
9
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
16
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
18
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%