Back

Linezolid population pharmacokinetics in rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis patients and interpretation challenges of the probability of target attainment

Nyang'wa, B.-T.; Motta, I.; Moodliar, R.; Solodovnikova, V.; Rajaram, S.; Rasool, M.; Berry, C.; Davies, G. R.; Moore, D.; Kloprogge, F.

2025-12-05 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2025.12.04.25340900 medRxiv
Show abstract

Linezolid is a key component of the BPaLM regimen (bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin), the recommended treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB). However, its optimal dosing and duration remain uncertain. To support dose optimization and efficacy interpretation, we developed a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of linezolid and evaluated exposure and probability of target attainment (PTA). Ninety-four RR-TB patients received linezolid 600 mg daily for 16 weeks, followed by 300 mg daily for 8 weeks. Plasma samples were collected at multiple time points across 24 weeks and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK modeling was performed using nlmixr2 in R. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination, fat-free mass allometric scaling best described the data. Typical clearance and volume were 6.66 L/h and 58.8 L, respectively. Median AUC2 was 84.34 mg{middle dot}h/L at 600 mg and 46.36 mg{middle dot}h/L at 300 mg. Median trough concentrations were 0.71 mg/L and 0.39 mg/L, respectively. The PTA analysis showed that the 600 mg dose achieved the fAUC2/MIC target of 119 only for isolates with MICs [≤]0.25 mg/L, however our randomized controlled trial findings suggest that a step-down strategy from 600 mg to 300 mg daily maintains efficacy in RR-TB treatment despite the lower linezolid exposure. This highlights the need to revise current pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets, which are based on linezolid monotherapy, to better reflect outcomes in combination therapy. These data support the use of BPaLM regimens with reduced toxicity risk and provide a foundation for future dose optimization efforts.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.