A multivariate pattern metric of individualized hemispheric functional asymmetry
Bi, Q.; Zhao, C.; Zuo, X.-N.; Peng, S.; Sun, B.; Gong, G.
Show abstract
Functional asymmetry is a fundamental feature of human brain organization, yet existing measures of functional connectivity asymmetry rely mainly on univariate indices that miss distributed pattern structure. We introduce the Pattern Dissimilarity of Hemispheric Functional Connectivity (PDHC), a multivariate metric that quantifies the pattern-level distance between each individuals left- and right-hemisphere connectivity architecture. In over one thousand adults, PDHC showed high test-retest reliability, cross-atlas robustness, and strong individual specificity. Network analyses indicated that hemispheric similarity is anchored in conserved sensorimotor and subcortical systems, whereas higher-order networks drive divergence. Developmental data from infancy through early adulthood revealed a characteristic trajectory: dissimilarity declines sharply early in life and increases modestly thereafter. Twin and Turner syndrome samples further demonstrated moderate heritability and sensitivity to X-chromosome dosage. PDHC thus provides a reliable and individualized metric of hemispheric functional architecture, offering a scalable tool for probing lateralization across development, genetics, cognition, and clinical conditions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional Connectivity Development along the Sensorimotor-Association Axis Enhances the Cortical Hierarchy 95%
- Myelination and excitation-inhibition balance synergistically shape structure-function coupling across the human cortex 95%
- Developmental Variations in Recurrent Spatiotemporal Brain Propagations from Childhood to Adulthood 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.