The emergence of intentional action in early human infancy
Fujihira, R.; Shinya, Y.; Watanabe, H.; Taga, G.
Show abstract
Intention lies at the core of human behavior, allowing flexible and goal-directed interaction with the environment. However, how it emerges in infancy remains poorly understood. Here we show that intentional action can emerge before overt reaching, revealing that 3-month-old infants display pupil dilation preceding self-initiated actions during interaction with a suspended mobile toy. This phasic pupil dilation first appeared after movement onset but gradually shifted to precede it through environmental interaction, reflecting the emergence of action preparation and prediction of action outcomes. This shift also implies that infants are capable of anticipating the timing of their forthcoming movements. Furthermore, the antecedent pupil dilation occurred only with efficient movements characterised by reduced muscle co-contractions. These findings suggest that infants learn to predict outcomes of their own actions and initiate particular movements at self-determined timings, marking the emergence of intentional action.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Scratch-AID: A Deep-learning Based System for Automatic Detection of Mouse Scratching Behavior with High Accuracy 92%
- Development of a Marmoset Apparatus for Automated Pulling (MarmoAAP) to Study Cooperative Behaviors 92%
- Postinspiratory complex acts as a gating mechanism regulating swallow-breathing coordination and other laryngeal behaviors 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive posture stabilization before contact with moving objects: equivalence of smooth pursuit tracking and peripheral vision 93%
- Pupil diameter tracked during motor adaptation in humans 93%
- Smooth pursuit eye movements contribute to anticipatory force control during mechanical stopping of moving objects 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.