Back

Impaired reach-to-grasp integration identifies cerebral visual impairment (CVI) in children and adults

Burke, C. J.; Nevin, M. W.; Grimm, D.; Mullin, C.; Peters, I. B.; Gonzalez, C. C.; Hay, I.; Shahani, U.; Ward, L. M.; Karl, J. M.

2025-12-04 neurology
10.64898/2025.12.03.25341574 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimCerebral Visual Impairment (CVI), an underdiagnosed cause of childhood visual impairment, presents heterogeneous symptoms involving varying degrees of dorsal and ventral stream dysfunction. We investigated whether impaired reach-to-grasp integration occurs in CVI as a potential marker of dorsal stream dysfunction. MethodPeople with CVI (children aged 7-17, n = 16; adults aged 18-25, n = 6) and control participants (children, n = 14; adults, n = 10) reached with their left hand to grasp plastic blocks with and without a blindfold. Reach-to-grasp timing and hand shaping measures were assessed using frame-by-frame video analysis. ResultsEven when they could see the block, people with CVI displayed prolonged grasp relative to reach durations, more static hand shaping during the reach, and increased reliance on non-visual hand shaping strategies after block contact to secure final grasp. The three measures were incorporated into a single composite Reach-to-Grasp Integration (RGI) score that distinguished people with CVI from controls. InterpretationTemporal, sensory, and functional dissociation of the reach and grasp occurs in CVI, consistent with dorsal stream dysfunction, and is captured by the RGI score. The RGI score could form the basis for CVI behavioural screening tools beyond standard visual assessments. What this paper addsO_LIPeople with CVI display impaired visually-guided integration of the reach and grasp, consistent with dorsal stream dysfunction. C_LIO_LIPeople with CVI use static preplanned hand shapes during visually-guided reaching. C_LIO_LIPeople with CVI rely on non-visual hand shaping strategies after target contact to facilitate grasping. C_LIO_LIThe composite Reach-to-Grasp Integration (RGI) score distinguishes CVI from control children and adults. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
2
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
4
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
6
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
8
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%