Machine Learning-Driven Drug Optimization for Typhoid Fever Based on Patient Profiles
Ssemuyiga, C.; Charles, S.; Saru, E.; Aleshinloye, Y. A.
Show abstract
IntroductionTyphoid fever remains a major Global public health concern, with treatment outcomes dependent on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and patient variability. Clinically determining the best medication for a certain patient can be difficult. Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) offer a promising avenue for improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding antibiotic selection using routinely collected clinical data MethodsWe developed a multi-task predictive framework using XGBoost models to predict (i) treatment outcome/success (binary), (ii) treatment duration (days), (iii) a resistance-proxy score, and (iv) suspected typhoid using clinical data; we assessed discrimination (AUC), calibration (Brier), and R{superscript 2} where appropriate, and used SHAP for explainability to interpret feature importance, derive patient clusters, and generate individualized model explanations. We further implemented a counterfactual drug-simulation experiment to compare actual prescribed antibiotics with predicted best options for each patient ResultsThe treatment outcome and suspected typhoid classification models achieved an AUROC of 0.9998 {+/-} 0.0001 and 0.9834 {+/-} 0.0007 respectively, accurately distinguishing between successful and failed therapies and typhoid and non-typhoid cases respectively. The treatment-duration and resistance-proxy regression models demonstrated strong explanatory capacity, accounting for 80% (R{superscript 2} = 0.8027 {+/-} 0.0054) and 90% (R{superscript 2} = 0.9014 {+/-} 0.0036) of the variance in therapy length and inferred resistance likelihood, respectively. SHAP analysis consistently highlighted the severity group, biochemical markers as dominant predictors across models and revealed biologically coherent patient subgroups. Counterfactual drug simulations suggested that alternative antibiotics could yield higher predicted success probabilities for a subset of patients, indicating the potential value of model-informed treatment ranking ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of machine learning for simulating drug choice in typhoid treatment using patient clinical profiles.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepDynaForecast: Phylogenetic-informed graph deep learning for epidemic transmission dynamic prediction 93%
- Decoding the Language of Microbiomes: Leveraging Patterns in 16S Public Data using Word-Embedding Techniques and Applications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease 93%
- Challenges of COVID-19 Case Forecasting in the US, 2020-2021 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informing antimicrobial stewardship with explainable AI 94%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 93%
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting future hospital antimicrobial resistance prevalence using machine learning 94%
- Pretrained Patient Trajectories for Adverse Drug Event Prediction Using Common Data Model-based Electronic Health Records 91%
- Machine learning models predict long COVID outcomes based on baseline clinical and immunologic factors 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment seeking behaviours, antibiotic use and relationships to multi-drug resistance: A study of urinary tract infection patients in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda 91%
- Modeling robust COVID-19 intensive care unit occupancy thresholds for imposing mitigation to prevent exceeding capacities 90%
- Model-informed target product profiles of long acting-injectables for use as seasonal malaria prevention 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.