Back

Associations between temperament profiles, eating habits and BMI-SDS development in early childhood

Tarro, S.; Tuulari, J.; Yada, A.; Ollas-Skogster, D.; Zarra-Nezhad, M.; Perasto, L.; Karlsson, L.; Karlsson, H.; Korja, R.; Nolvi, S.; Lukkarinen, M.

2025-12-04 nutrition
10.64898/2025.12.03.25341535 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly temperament may shape childrens eating behaviours and growth, yet longitudinal evidence supporting these associations remains limited. We aimed to identify latent temperament profiles from 6 months to 5 years and examine their associations with eating behaviours and longitudinal changes in BMI-SDS. MethodsData were drawn from the FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, a population based longitudinal study in Southwest Finland (n=2,286). Child temperament was assessed at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 4, and 5 years using validated questionnaires. Eating behaviour was reported at age 2, and BMI-SDS was measured at ages 2 and 5. Latent profile analysis was conducted on repeated temperament measures. Associations with outcomes were examined using the BCH method. ResultsThree temperament profiles emerged: Dysregulated group (38%; low self-regulation, low to average positive reactivity, low negative reactivity), High self-regulation group (37%: high self-regulation, low negative reactivity, high to average positive reactivity), High negative reactivity group (24%: high negative reactivity, moderate positive reactivity, average self-regulation). The high self-regulation group showed more favorable eating behaviours (less snacking and fussiness, more willingness to taste new foods) compared to the other groups. High negative reactivity group showed greater decrease in BMI than Dysregulated group. Other BMI change differences were non-significant. ConclusionsDistinct temperament profiles were linked to early eating behaviours and, to a lesser extent, BMI development. Understanding these early temperament-based patterns may help identify children at risk for less favourable eating patterns and inform tailored early interventions to promote healthy eating and growth.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
6
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.1%
8
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
9
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
10
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
18
Twin Research and Human Genetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%