Back

Associations between temperament profiles, eating habits and BMI-SDS development in early childhood

Tarro, S.; Tuulari, J.; Yada, A.; Ollas-Skogster, D.; Zarra-Nezhad, M.; Perasto, L.; Karlsson, L.; Karlsson, H.; Korja, R.; Nolvi, S.; Lukkarinen, M.

2025-12-04 nutrition
10.64898/2025.12.03.25341535 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly temperament may shape childrens eating behaviours and growth, yet longitudinal evidence supporting these associations remains limited. We aimed to identify latent temperament profiles from 6 months to 5 years and examine their associations with eating behaviours and longitudinal changes in BMI-SDS. MethodsData were drawn from the FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, a population based longitudinal study in Southwest Finland (n=2,286). Child temperament was assessed at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 4, and 5 years using validated questionnaires. Eating behaviour was reported at age 2, and BMI-SDS was measured at ages 2 and 5. Latent profile analysis was conducted on repeated temperament measures. Associations with outcomes were examined using the BCH method. ResultsThree temperament profiles emerged: Dysregulated group (38%; low self-regulation, low to average positive reactivity, low negative reactivity), High self-regulation group (37%: high self-regulation, low negative reactivity, high to average positive reactivity), High negative reactivity group (24%: high negative reactivity, moderate positive reactivity, average self-regulation). The high self-regulation group showed more favorable eating behaviours (less snacking and fussiness, more willingness to taste new foods) compared to the other groups. High negative reactivity group showed greater decrease in BMI than Dysregulated group. Other BMI change differences were non-significant. ConclusionsDistinct temperament profiles were linked to early eating behaviours and, to a lesser extent, BMI development. Understanding these early temperament-based patterns may help identify children at risk for less favourable eating patterns and inform tailored early interventions to promote healthy eating and growth.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
7
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
9
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
10
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
13
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%