Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial: Clinical effectiveness of peripheral intravenous device selection and insertion by a vascular access specialist (The SELECT Trial)
Patel, M.; Marsh, N.; El-Heneidy, A.; O'Brien, C.; Larsen, E.; Corley, A.; Ware, R. S.
Show abstract
The "Clinical effectiveness of peripheral intravenous device selection and insertion by a vascular access specialist" (The SELECT Study)" is a single-centre two-arm superiority randomised clinical trial (RCT). This RCT aims to compare peripherally placed IV device selection and insertion by a Vascular access specialist with a generalist inserter. The purpose for this document is to minimise bias and ensure transparency and internal validity for the findings of the trial, by defining and making publicly available the analysis approach prior to reviewing or analysing trial data. The statistical analysis plan will inform analysis and reporting of the main effectiveness findings of the trial. It provides a detailed description of the primary and secondary trial outcomes and the methods for statistical comparison.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Criteria to Achieve Safe Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch in Hospitalised Adult Populations: A Systematic Rapid Review 93%
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- A text messaging intervention to support patients with chronic pain during prescription opioid tapering: protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 95%
- Registration, Publication, and Outcome Reporting among Pivotal Clinical Trials that Supported FDA Approval of High-Risk Medical Devices Before and After FDAAA 93%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: a study protocol 97%
- Doxycycline for the prevention of progression of COVID-19 to severe disease requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission: a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial (DOXPREVENT.ICU) 93%
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review 92%
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 90%
- Effectiveness of a digital clinical decision support algorithm for guiding antibiotic prescribing in pediatric outpatient care in Rwanda: A pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Decision Support in Cardiovascular Medicine: Effectiveness, Implementation Barriers, and Regulation 93%
- Prophylaxis for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis 91%
- Prone positioning of patients with moderate hypoxia due to COVID-19: A multicenter pragmatic randomized trial [COVID-PRONE] 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.