Comprehensive neurodevelopmental assessment through non-specialists: Validation of the STREAM digital platform in India and Malawi
Williams, E. H.; McCray, G.; Thompson, N. M.; Crespo-Llado, M. M.; Ranjan, A.; Gajria, D.; Mukherjee, D.; Ngoma, V.; Namathanga, C.; Nkhata, R.; Bennie, A.; Kawelama, U.; Midha, N.; Singh, A.; Mpakiza, I.; Del Bianco, T.; Lockwood Estrin, G.; Mason, L.; Choudhary, A.; Gulati, S.; Johnson, M. H.; Belmonte, M. K.; Jones, E.; Patel, V.; Chandran, S.; Bhavnani, S.; Mbale, E.; Divan, G.; Gladstone, M.; Chakrabarti, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundChildren in low-resource settings often lack access to culturally appropriate and feasible neurodevelopmental assessments. Existing tools are costly, require specialist training, and were developed in high-resource settings, limiting their scalability. The Scalable TRansdiagnostic Early Assessment of Mental health (STREAM) project uses a mobile platform, delivered by non-specialist workers, to assess motor, social, and cognitive development in children aged 0-6 years. We report STREAM scores, psychometric properties, and age-standardised reference curves from India and Malawi. MethodsWe recruited children aged 0-6 years in New Delhi (India) and Blantyre (Malawi) from two samples: community (clinics and early education centres) and enriched (children with existing/suspected neurodevelopmental conditions). Trained non-specialists administered STREAM in community settings. Motor, cognitive, and social domain scores were derived from age-adjusted data using structural equation modelling (SEM). Validity was assessed against the Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS), caregiver-reported developmental measures, and anthropometric indices. We examined known-groups discriminability, test-retest reliability, and 18-month responsiveness to change. FindingsWe assessed 3992 children (community=3733; enriched=259). SEM fit exceeded standard benchmarks (RMSEA=0.03; CFI=0.98; TLI=0.97). Across both sites, we found extensive evidence for STREAMs criterion validity [range: r=0.31,0.65], convergent validity (9/12 related constructs correlated significantly), and known-groups validity (all hypothesised groups differed significantly). Test-retest reliability was largely good (>0.60&<0.74), and the Indian sample showed some evidence of responsiveness to change. InterpretationWe provide evidence that STREAM is a valid and reliable mobile assessment of neurodevelopment in low-resource settings, designed for delivery by non-specialists in community settings. It captures key neurodevelopmental domains, demonstrates robust psychometric properties, enables standardised monitoring via reference curves, and provides a scalable approach to reducing inequities in access to neurodevelopmental assessments in settings where specialist-delivered tools may not be feasible due to cost, training requirements, or cultural applicability. FundingMedical Research Council (MRC) Global Challenges Research Fund (MR/S036423/1).
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of Covid-19 on Nurturing Care in Nairobi Slums: Findings from 5 rounds of cross-sectional telephone surveys 94%
- Real world external validation of metabolic gestational age assessment in Kenya 92%
- Collecting mortality data via mobile phone surveys: a non-inferiority randomized trial in Malawi 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Autism Caregiver Coaching in Africa (ACACIA): Protocol for a type 1-hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial 93%
- Comprehensive profiling of social mixing patterns in resource poor countries: a mixed methods research protocol 93%
- Factors associated with low school readiness, a linked health and education data study in Wales, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geographical validation of the Smart Triage Model by age group 93%
- Improving outcomes for children with malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia in Mozambique through the inSCALE technology innovation: A cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interrupting the intergenerational cycle of violence: protocol for a three-generational longitudinal mixed-methods study in South Africa (INTERRUPT_VIOLENCE) 92%
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 92%
- Quantifying Contact Patterns in Response to COVID-19 Public Health Measures in Canada 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.