Back

Comprehensive neurodevelopmental assessment through non-specialists: Validation of the STREAM digital platform in India and Malawi

Williams, E. H.; McCray, G.; Thompson, N. M.; Crespo-Llado, M. M.; Ranjan, A.; Gajria, D.; Mukherjee, D.; Ngoma, V.; Namathanga, C.; Nkhata, R.; Bennie, A.; Kawelama, U.; Midha, N.; Singh, A.; Mpakiza, I.; Del Bianco, T.; Lockwood Estrin, G.; Mason, L.; Choudhary, A.; Gulati, S.; Johnson, M. H.; Belmonte, M. K.; Jones, E.; Patel, V.; Chandran, S.; Bhavnani, S.; Mbale, E.; Divan, G.; Gladstone, M.; Chakrabarti, B.

2025-12-08 public and global health
10.64898/2025.12.03.25341202 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildren in low-resource settings often lack access to culturally appropriate and feasible neurodevelopmental assessments. Existing tools are costly, require specialist training, and were developed in high-resource settings, limiting their scalability. The Scalable TRansdiagnostic Early Assessment of Mental health (STREAM) project uses a mobile platform, delivered by non-specialist workers, to assess motor, social, and cognitive development in children aged 0-6 years. We report STREAM scores, psychometric properties, and age-standardised reference curves from India and Malawi. MethodsWe recruited children aged 0-6 years in New Delhi (India) and Blantyre (Malawi) from two samples: community (clinics and early education centres) and enriched (children with existing/suspected neurodevelopmental conditions). Trained non-specialists administered STREAM in community settings. Motor, cognitive, and social domain scores were derived from age-adjusted data using structural equation modelling (SEM). Validity was assessed against the Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS), caregiver-reported developmental measures, and anthropometric indices. We examined known-groups discriminability, test-retest reliability, and 18-month responsiveness to change. FindingsWe assessed 3992 children (community=3733; enriched=259). SEM fit exceeded standard benchmarks (RMSEA=0.03; CFI=0.98; TLI=0.97). Across both sites, we found extensive evidence for STREAMs criterion validity [range: r=0.31,0.65], convergent validity (9/12 related constructs correlated significantly), and known-groups validity (all hypothesised groups differed significantly). Test-retest reliability was largely good (>0.60&<0.74), and the Indian sample showed some evidence of responsiveness to change. InterpretationWe provide evidence that STREAM is a valid and reliable mobile assessment of neurodevelopment in low-resource settings, designed for delivery by non-specialists in community settings. It captures key neurodevelopmental domains, demonstrates robust psychometric properties, enables standardised monitoring via reference curves, and provides a scalable approach to reducing inequities in access to neurodevelopmental assessments in settings where specialist-delivered tools may not be feasible due to cost, training requirements, or cultural applicability. FundingMedical Research Council (MRC) Global Challenges Research Fund (MR/S036423/1).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.