Back

Early Cancer Detection in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome with Cell-Free DNA

Ensminger, E.; Luo, P.; Sobotka, J. A.; Wong, D.; Prokopec, S. D.; Bruce, J. P.; Danesh, A.; Eagles, J.; Oldfield, L.; Pederson, S.; Farncombe, K. M.; Purnaghshband, H.; Aguilar-Mahecha, A.; Nand, A.; Lujan Toro, B. E.; Heisler, L. E.; Lam, B.; Veit-Haibach, P.; Lupien, M.; Basik, M.; Kim, R. H.; Pugh, T.; CHARM Consortium,

2025-12-04 oncology
10.64898/2025.12.03.25340892 medRxiv
Show abstract

Early cancer detection for individuals with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC) remains limited by the low sensitivity of available tests and lack of clinical surveillance methods for many cancers beyond breast cancer. To investigate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing as a pan-cancer surveillance modality, we analyzed 194 blood plasma samples from 88 BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers (BRCA1/2-carriers) using a multimodal assay integrating genomic and epigenomic (fragmentomic & DNA methylation) features. Cancer-associated signals were detected in 71% (43/61) of carriers with active cancers detected by conventional surveillance, as well as 30/54 patients (56%) with negative surveillance findings. Of the negative patients 43% (13/30) subsequently developed cancer within 2 years (12 non-breast cancers), suggesting early detection of occult cancers. These findings demonstrate the value of integrating multiple cfDNA analyses and support the potential of longitudinal, multimodal liquid biopsy analysis to improve early detection and risk stratification in BRCA1/2-carriers. Significance StatementImproved clinical surveillance methods are urgently needed for BRCA1/2 germline carriers. We show that integrating cell-free DNA genomic and epigenomic (fragmentomic and DNA methylation) based assays identifies cancer-associated signals not captured by standard methods, supporting its use as a complementary non-invasive strategy for longitudinal monitoring in high-risk individuals.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.