Back

Cryo-electron microscopy ensemble optimization using individual particles and physical constraints

Sanchez, D. S.; Thiede, E. H.; Lederman, R.; Cossio, P.

2025-12-04 biophysics
10.64898/2025.12.02.691891 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWBiomolecules are inherently dynamic, and understanding their conformational ensemble distributions is essential for understanding their dynamics and biological roles. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), a technique that images individual biomolecules frozen in a thin layer of amorphous ice, has emerged as a leading method for determining the structure of biomolecules at atomic resolution. Recent advances in cryo-EM reconstruction have made significant progress in determining structure in heterogeneous conformational landscapes. In contrast to reconstruction, a different class of techniques has been used to infer population weights, referred to as ensemble reweighting. These methods have yet to be generalized to infer structural heterogeneity simultaneously. Here, we present a method for cryo-EM ensemble optimization that directly infers the optimal set of structures and their associated population weights from cryo-EM images using Bayesian optimization techniques. Our method iterates between optimizing the structures and weights using a likelihood defined in terms of cryo-EM particle images (not reconstructions) and projecting onto the domain of a physical prior through an approach inspired by projected gradient descent. We test the method on several systems, ranging from a four-atom toy model to a large protein system with real cryo-EM data. We find that our approach successfully recovers the structures and their associated weights across a wide range of experimental conditions, even when the number of structures does not match the actual number of metastable states. Our method paves the way for cryo-EM ensemble optimization of flexible biomolecules exhibiting complex, multimodal conformational landscapes.

Published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (predicted rank #13) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.