Back

The 5-HT1A receptor selective agonist NLX-204 displays analgesic activity in the knee osteoarthritis and plantar incisional post-operative pain models in rats

Depoortere, R. Y.; Newman-Tancredi, A.

2025-12-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.02.691847 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNLX-204 is a highly selective, high efficacy biased agonist at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors, which are well-established modulators of pain processing. ObjectiveTo evaluate the analgesic activity of NLX-204 in two rat models of nociceptive/inflammatory pain: the monoiodoacetate (MIA)-induced knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and the Brennans plantar incision model, using morphine as an active comparator, in both male and female rats. MethodsKOA was induced by left intra-articular MIA injection. Analgesic effects of NLX-204 (0.1-3 mg/kg p.o.) or morphine (6 mg/kg s.c.) were assessed on days 5 and 8 by measuring withdrawal threshold (WT) using von Frey filaments and dynamic weight bearing (DWB) on injured and contralateral limbs. In the Brennans model, the plantar surface of the left hind limb was incised with elevation and incision of the plantaris muscle. Mechanical allodynia (WT) and guarding behavior (GB) were assessed 24 h post-surgery. ResultsIn the MIA-KOA model, NLX-204 significantly attenuated DWB imbalance in males at 1-3 mg/kg (acute) and 0.1-3 mg/kg (repeated dosing), and in females at 3 mg/kg (repeated dosing only). NLX-204 demonstrated anti-allodynic activity (VF filaments) from 0.3 mg/kg in males (acute and repeated) and from 1 mg/kg in females. In the Brennans model, NLX-204 reduced GB scores at 1 mg/kg (males) and 0.3-1 mg/kg (females), and showed anti-allodynic effects from 0.3 mg/kg in both sexes. Morphine was effective in both models under acute and repeated administration. ConclusionsOral NLX-204 demonstrates dose-dependent analgesic and anti-allodynic activity in two rat models of nociceptive/inflammatory pain, supporting the therapeutic potential of selective, high-efficacy 5-HT1A receptor agonists as a novel non-opioid strategy for pain management.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.1%
2
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.4%
5
Pharmacological Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
8
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
9
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
10
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
11
The Journal of Headache and Pain
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
12
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
14
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
15
Arthritis Research & Therapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.5%
25
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%