Back

Tracking GAD-specific T-cell expansions in Type 1 diabetes by intradermal GAD-Alum challenge

Hanna, S. J.; Robinson, E. J. S.; Thayer, T. C.; Nakayama, M.; Landry, L.; Andrews, R.; Dolton, G.; Davies, J.; Williams, E.; Pearson, J. A.; Sewell, A. K.; Narendran, P.; Wraith, D.; Howell, A.; Young, P.; Hart, M.; Lindqvist, A.; Wong, F. S.; Tree, T. I. M.; Dayan, C. M.; Tatovic, D.

2025-12-05 immunology
10.64898/2025.12.02.690944 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying and monitoring autoreactive T cells that drive beta cell destruction remains a major obstacle to developing effective immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes (T1D). These cells are extremely rare in peripheral blood and cannot be accessed directly from the pancreas. We used intradermal injection of GAD-Alum to recruit GAD-specific T cells to accessible sites in the skin and skin-draining lymph nodes (LNs), sampled by skin suction blisters and ultrasound-guided LN aspiration. Peripheral blood samples obtained before GAD injection were restimulated with GAD in vitro to detect reactive CD4+ T cells. Re-expression of selected T cell receptors (TCRs) confirmed antigen specificity. Up to 70% of T cells at the skin injection site were clonally-expanded and 4 of 14 (28%) re-expressed TCRs were GAD-reactive. In draining LNs 1 of 14 (4%) clonally-expanded TCRs was GAD-reactive, representing [~]0.08% of all T-cells. GAD-reactive cells across compartments displayed Th1 and Th17-associated transcription signatures. These results demonstrate the intradermal autoantigen challenge, coupled with scRNAseq, enables direct identification and molecular profiling of autoreactive T cells in vivo. This minimally invasive approach provides a powerful platform for tracking antigen-specific specific T cells to monitor disease activity and evaluate immune interventions in T1D.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.