Quantifying myocardial repolarization instability using wearable radar-based non-contact estimation of the JT variability index
Riaz, Z.; Pella, S. I.; Tom, N.; Halaki, M.; Esgin, T.; Ugander, M.; Yuce, M.
Show abstract
Background and AimsMyocardial repolarization instability measured by electrocardiography (ECG) as the QT variability index (QTVI) predicts arrhythmic risk. We aimed to introduce and validate a non-contact wearable radar-based method for assessing myocardial repolarization instability. MethodsQTVI by ECG (normalized QT variability to normalized heart rate variability) was compared to the analogous J-point-to-T-end variability index (JTVI) by ECG. Simultaneous 2-minute ECG and wearable radar recordings were analysed using an intelligent algorithm to extract mechanical correlates of the J-point and Tend from radar-derived cardiac motion signals, and compared to JTVI by ECG. ResultsBased on a selection of publicly available datasets of 9 patients with atrial fibrillation, 11 patients with sinus rhythm and 20 healthy people (n=40, 23% with atrial fibrillation, mean{+/-}SD heart rate 85{+/-}12 beats/min, QTVI -0.36{+/-}0.75, JTVI -0.10{+/-}0.75), the SD of JT and QT intervals strongly agreed (R{superscript 2}>0.99, bias -0.4{+/-}1.5 ms, 1.1{+/-}3.9%), and JTVI and QTVI correlated closely (R{superscript 2}=0.98, QTVI=1.0*JTVI-0.26, bias -0.26{+/-}0.11). Among a separate group of healthy volunteers (n=20, age 43{+/-}11 years, 25% female, heart rate 66{+/-}14 beats/min, JTVI - 0.52{+/-}0.51), there was excellent agreement for ECG-derived and radar-estimated SD of JT (R{superscript 2}=0.88, bias 0.1{+/-}4.9 ms, 6.4{+/-}2.7 %), SD of beat-to-beat interval (SDNN) (R{superscript 2}=0.93, bias 16.0{+/-}22.1 ms, 9.5{+/-}4.9 %), and JTVI (R{superscript 2}=0.99, bias 0.00{+/-}0.05, 0.0{+/-}6.5 %). ConclusionQTVI and JTVI adjusted for a small bias are effectively interchangeable for quantifying myocardial repolarization instability, and JTVI can be accurately and precisely estimated using radar sensors. This illustrates the feasibility for non-contact wearable radar-based monitoring of arrhythmic risk, with particular applicability to culturally sensitive populations.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An Open-Access Simultaneous Electrocardiogram and Phonocardiogram Database 97%
- Comparison of feature-based indices derived from photoplethysmogram recorded from different body locations during lower body negative pressure 97%
- High-Fidelity Measurement of Pulse Arrival Time in Critically Ill Children Using Standard Bedside Monitoring Equipment 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Digitizing ECG image: new fully automated method and open-source software code 97%
- BRAVEHEART: Open-source software for automated electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic analysis 96%
- An algorithm to detect dicrotic notch in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography waveforms using the iterative envelope mean method 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of wearable and clinical devices for acquisition of peripheral nervous system signals 97%
- Feasibility of Ultra-Short Term Analysis of Heart Rate and Systolic Arterial Pressure Variability at Rest and During Stress via Time-domain and Entropy-based Measures 95%
- In-Ear SpO2: A Tool for Wearable, Unobtrusive Monitoring of Hypoxaemia in COVID-19 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.