How organizations can support interprofessional collaboration through the eyes of faculty and other professionals
Polansky, M. N.; Buslovich, A. L.; Maring, J.; Thompson, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionInterprofessional collaborative practice (IPC) is deemed essential to address the quadruple aims of improving healthcare. There is also emerging interest in the role IPC among healthcare faculty in their educational and research roles educators. Various facilitators and barriers of IPC at the individual and team levels have been identified. However, organizations and systems are often strong drivers for professional practice and limited attention has been placed on the strategies needed for organizations to support IPC. This study explored the perspectives of faculty and other professions regarding organizational facilitators and barriers to IPC, as well as strategies to support IPC within their own professional contexts. MethodsDocument analysis was performed on papers from a course entitled "Interprofessional Collaboration in Practice", a requirement of a Doctor of Health Sciences in Clinical and Academic Leadership program. The papers were written as part of a culminating project exploring opportunities to enhance IPC within students own professional contexts. Students used reflections of their own professional experiences, informed by the literature and other course content, as well as informal interviews with other professionals in their workplace, to explore facilitators, and barriers to IPC. Inductive content analysis was performed by two members of the research team. Final results and selective quotes were reviewed by the full research team. ResultsTwenty papers written by students of various professional backgrounds, professional roles, and organizational types were included. Four dominant themes were identified that reflected facilitators and barriers to IPC that existed within students organizations. These four aspects of organizations appear to be both essential and inter-related, and include organizational systems, strategic priorities, culture, and institutional leaders. ConclusionOrganizations and their senior leaders play a critical role in developing collaborative organizations where employees from various professions effectively work together to accomplish organizational goals. In addition to the current practice of preparing individual healthcare professionals for IPC, attention to organizations and their leaders is essential. Faculty and other professionals have particularly valuable perspectives in understanding how IPC can be advanced in healthcare organizations and should be the focus of future professional development initiatives and additional research related to IPC. Trial registrationnot applicable
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 96%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 94%
- Team-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Instruction for Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Physician Associate Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experiences, challenges, and enablers for promoting interprofessional education among medical students: A Scoping Review 96%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 93%
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 93%
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 94%
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 91%
- The Influence of Public Health Faculty on College and University Plans during the COVID-19 Pandemic 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.