Back

The Failure Index as marker of cochlear health in MED-EL CI users: Anatomy, demographics, and speech correlations

Konerding, W.; Batsoulis, C.; Baumhoff, P.; Benav, H.; Gaertner, L.; Guenther, A.; de Olano Dieterich, O.; Schurzig, D.; Strahl, S.; Tillein, J.; Vormelcher, S.; Buechner, A.; Garnham, C.; Kral, A.

2025-12-04 otolaryngology
10.64898/2025.12.02.25341153 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) enable hearing with the deafened ear, via direct, electrical stimulation of the spiral ganglion neurons (SGN). Thus, the outcome depends on the number and excitability of the SGNs. We recently established the electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP)-derived Failure Index (FI) as cochlear-health marker in the animal model. The FI informs about the presence, site, and size of a SGN lesion. Here, we translated the FI to clinical recordings of MED-EL CI users. For the retrospective study, we selected patient data from the database of the German Hearing Center Hannover recorded 2017 to 2024. We included 199 post-lingually and 79 pre-lingually deafened ears. Averaged FIs over all contacts of a CI were stable within the analysis period (3rd month to 1st year postoperatively). The FI increased with age and was elevated for etiologies associated with higher SGN loss. Utilizing 3D information from cone beam-computed tomography scans, we confirmed that the FI was independent of distance (0.1-2.5 mm) to the modiolus. The FI showed individual patterns along the array with maxima usually at basal contacts, corresponding to elevated SGN loss at high frequencies. In a selected group of post-lingually deaf ears, we confirmed the correlation of the FI with speech perception in quiet and in noise (n=28, r2=0.12-0.55). Thus, we propose the FI as promising clinical tool to identify CI-implanted ears with reduced neural health and contacts close to areas of SGN loss. Thereby, it can serve to guide speech-processor fitting to optimize CI outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.4%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.2%
5
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.2%
8
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
18
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
20
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
23
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%