Back

Virtual aquatic ecology: stepped simulations of gross production within constraints explain biomass changes

Cotter, A. J.

2025-12-04 ecology
10.64898/2025.12.01.691727 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A simulator, ECOLPS in R, is developed and trialed for ecological studies of closed aquatic ecosystems. Its constraint-based approach contrasts with function-based models widely applied in ecology. Total gross production ({Sigma}GP) by wild components (= species/life stages, grouped by ecological roles) is maximized within constraints over short time steps using linear programming, thereby enabling simulations of opportunistic growth and harvesting by competing components. Constraints use integrated terms from an [n]-component generalization of the Lotka-Volterra (LV) predator-prey model, and from mass-based models for fisheries, non-living organics, nutrients and essential habitats. Seasonality uses programmed temperature and light indices. Trial simulations, total 12, sought first to confirm conformance with LV theory. Further trials of gradually increasing ecosystem complexity were designed to simulate wellknown ecological events. They found biomass oscillations depending on starting biomasses and seasons, predator satiation, competitive exclusion, predator diets dependent on available prey, instability of unconstrained 3-level food chains, limitation of GP by essential habitats and nutrients, recycling of nutrient and biomass, trophic cascades and wasp-waist systems caused by fishing, and seasonal succession. Step-wise studies of simulated series explained results. A constrained-GP hypothesis is proposed. Priorities for further developments are suggested. ECOLPS simulations could support cause-and-effect investigations, field work, and aquatic ecological risk assessments.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.