Organoid Pharmacotyping of Pancreatic Cancer Enables Functional Precision Oncology and Drug Repurposing
Dong, H.; Vizeacoumar, F. S.; Zhang, Y.; Jette, N.; Price, J. D.; Maranda, V.; Gong, L.; Freywald, T.; Vizeacoumar, J. P.; Lazell-Wright, M.; Uuganbayar, S.; Quail, J.; Morejon Morales, A.; Rizvi, A.; Kanthan, R.; Wu, Y.; Krishnan, A.; Felton, K.; Marwa, B.; Hopkins, L.; Groot, G.; Shaw, J.; Beck, G.; Luo, Y.; Ogaick, M.; Moser, M.; Freywald, A.; Ahmed, S.; Zaidi, A.; Vizeacoumar, F. J.
Show abstract
PurposePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest malignancies, with limited benefit from current cytotoxic regimens and poor predictive value of genomics alone. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) represent a promising platform for functional precision oncology, yet systematic pharmacotyping of genomically annotated PDAC PDOs remains sparse. Experimental DesignWe established a clinically annotated panel of ten treatment-naive PDAC PDOs spanning well-, moderately-, and poorly differentiated tumors. PDOs were evaluated for morphologic and genomic fidelity and screened against 1,813 clinically relevant small molecules in a high-throughput 384-well format. Drug sensitivities were quantified at the compound and drug-family levels and integrated with histologic grade, pathway-level mutational profiles, and available clinical treatment information. ResultsPDOs preserved hallmark tumor features, including glandular organization and subclonal mutational architecture. Pharmacotyping revealed both shared and subtype-specific vulnerabilities. Classical (well/moderately differentiated) PDOs showed enriched mutations in DNA repair, mitotic spindle, and chromatin-regulatory pathways and were preferentially sensitive to topoisomerase inhibitors, microtubule poisons, and HDAC inhibitors. In contrast, basal (poorly differentiated) PDOs displayed coordinated defects in mitochondrial function, vesicle trafficking, and ubiquitin-mediated proteostasis, at the pathway level, that conferred a previously unrecognized vulnerability to cardiac glycosides. Sensitivities to standard PDAC agents were heterogeneous across models, underscoring the limited predictive value of genotype alone and the need for functional drug testing. ConclusionsThis integrated genomic and pharmacologic analysis demonstrates that PDO pharmacotyping identifies biologically grounded, actionable vulnerabilities in PDAC, including novel therapeutic opportunities in basal, chemo-resistant tumors. These findings support PDO-guided functional profiling as a clinically relevant platform for refining drug selection and expanding treatment options for patients with PDAC. SignificancePDAC is dominated by chemoresistance and lacks reliable genomic predictors of therapy response. By integrating high-throughput drug screening with mutation-informed pathway analysis in patient-derived organoids, we identify differentiation-linked therapeutic liabilities, including a previously unrecognized vulnerability to cardiac glycosides in basal PDAC. These results highlight PDO pharmacotyping as a powerful functional complement to genomics for guiding treatment selection in pancreatic cancer.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Netrin G1 promotes pancreatic tumorigenesis through cancer associated fibroblastdriven nutritional support and immunosuppression 95%
- Tumor Explants Elucidate a Cascade of Paracrine SHH, WNT, and VEGF Signals Driving Pancreatic Cancer Angiosuppression 94%
- Mesenchymal Lineage Heterogeneity Underlies Non-Redundant Functions of Pancreatic Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting DNA damage response and Replication Stress in Pancreatic Cancer 95%
- Loss of Rnf43 accelerates Kras-mediated neoplasia and remodels the tumor immune microenvironment in pancreatic adenocarcinoma 95%
- BRD9-SMAD2/3 orchestrates stemness and tumorigenesis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.