Machine learning model predicts new-onset deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities after pelvic floor fracture surgery and targeted diagnosis
fu, h.; Dong, Q.; LI, G.; Zhao, K.; Hou, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundPostoperative new-onset deep vein thrombosis (PNO-DVT) of the lower extremities represents a prevalent and serious clinical complication following pelvic fractures, which substantially impedes patient rehabilitation and diminishes quality of life. Conventional risk assessment methodologies exhibit inherent limitations, rendering them inadequate for precise prediction and individualized management of DVT. In recent years, machine learning techniques have demonstrated significant advantages in data analysis, emerging as promising tools for predicting postoperative DVT risk. This study sought to investigate the predictive efficacy of machine learning models for the development of new-onset lower extremity deep vein thrombosis following pelvic fracture surgery. MethodsData from 745 patients who underwent pelvic fracture surgery at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2019 were collected. The analysis encompassed demographic information, general patient data, preoperative laboratory test results, surgical details, and scoring systems. Initially, the data were analyzed using univariate logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and multivariate logistic regression to identify 12 independent risk factors, including age, HDL-C, and ApoB. Subsequently, the dataset was partitioned into a training set and a test set at a 7:3 ratio. Six models were employed for analysis, including logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and AdaBoost. ConclusionComparative analysis of the six machine learning models revealed XGBoost exhibited the highest performance (AUC: 0.8633), followed by LightGBM (0.8349), random forest (0.8055), logistic regression (0.7503), SVM (0.7505), and AdaBoost (0.8179). Model sensitivity ranged from 0.3684 to 0.8421, and accuracy ranged from 0.6502 to 0.9238.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Biomechanical stress analysis of Type-A aortic dissection at pre-dissection, post-dissection, and post-repair states 94%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 93%
- Deployment of a digital twin using the coupled momentum method for fluid-structure interaction: a case study for aortic aneurysm 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced and Interpretable Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care 96%
- Risk Factors For The Development Of Hospital-Acquired Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism: Dealing With Potentially Causal And Confounding Risk Factors Using Directed Acyclic Graph (Dag) Analysis 96%
- Altered kinetics of circulating progenitor cells in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) associated vasoplegic patients: A pilot study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 94%
- Centhaquine Increases Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Patients with Hypovolemic Shock 93%
- Integrative systems biology approach identified crucial genes and transcription factors associated with gallbladder cancer pathogenesis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction among Medicare beneficiaries: Applications of competing risks analysis and gradient boosted model. 88%
- Sixty-day mortality among 520 Italian hospitalized COVID-19 patients according to the adopted ventilatory strategy in the context of an integrated multidisciplinary clinical organization: a population-based cohort study 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.