Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of the Next-Generation COVID-19 mRNA-1283 Vaccine in the United States
Fust, K.; Kohli, M.; Joshi, K.; Cartier, S.; Lee, A.; Van de Velde, N.; Weinstein, M.; Beck, E.
Show abstract
AimsCOVID-19 disease burden in United States (US) adults [≥]65 years and persons with underlying medical conditions remains high. This modeling study estimates the cost-effectiveness of the next-generation COVID-19 mRNA-1283 vaccine in those ages 12-64 at high-risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes and all adults [≥]65 years. MethodsmRNA-1283 was compared to no annual vaccination and originally licensed mRNA vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2. Analyses were conducted using a static decision-analytic model (1-year horizon). Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection and hospitalization for mRNA-1283 versus no vaccination was based on relative VE (rVE) from the Phase 3 pivotal randomized controlled trial comparing mRNA-1283 against mRNA-1273 and mRNA-1273 real-world data. rVE estimates for mRNA-1283 versus BNT162b2 were based on an indirect treatment comparison. The societal incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and the benefit cost ratio (BCR) were calculated. ResultsDuring the 2025/2026 season, a single dose of mRNA-1283 was estimated to yield an incremental cost per QALY gained of $16,241 compared to no vaccine. The BCR for the base case strategy ranged from 2.16-9.74 USD returned for one dollar spent for mRNA-1283. mRNA-1283 was shown to dominate originally licensed COVID-19 vaccines in analyses of the target population. Results are sensitive to COVID-19 incidence, hospitalization rates, post-discharge mortality rates, and VE. LimitationsThe real-world effectiveness and safety of mRNA-1283 have not yet been established and relative VE estimates should be validated with real-world data. 2025/2026 COVID-19 incidence and vaccine uptake in the US is uncertain. ConclusionsStudy results suggest mRNA-1283 represents a highly cost-effective strategy (considering a $100,000-150,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold) to reduce burden of COVID-19 among the target population. Given the finding of mRNA-1283 dominance in this population compared to originally approved mRNA vaccines, mRNA-1283 provides a valuable option to optimize US COVID-19 immunization programs and protect those most vulnerable.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential economic impact of the updated COVID-19 mRNA fall 2023 vaccines in Japan 98%
- Comparative Effectiveness of the Bivalent (Original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines mRNA-1273.222 and BNT162b2 Bivalent in Adults With Underlying Medical Conditions in the United States 94%
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake and effectiveness by time since vaccination in the Western Cape province, South Africa: An observational cohort study during 2020-2022 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world Effectiveness and Causal Mediation Study of BNT162b2 on Long COVID Risks in Children and Adolescents 95%
- Population immunity of natural infection, primary-series vaccination, and booster vaccination in Qatar during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study 94%
- Global Burden of Covid-19 Restrictions: National, Regional and Global Estimates 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 95%
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of a third dose of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 among adults aged ≥65 years in the United States 95%
- 2024-2025 BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in non-immunocompromised adults: mid-season estimates from vaccine registries in two states linked to administrative claims 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.