Back

Predictors of early newborn deaths at Dar es Salaam public regional referral hospitals: A prospective observational hospital-based study.

Mhando, G. F.; Kalabamu, F. S.; Fataki, M. R.; Galabawa, C. C.; Leshabari, K. M.

2025-12-02 epidemiology
10.64898/2025.12.01.25341364 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionNewborn deaths are still a concern to global health systems. Increased rates of documented hospital-based births are incongruent to newborn survival chances worldwide. Factors for that rather paradoxical observation are largely unknown. We aimed to assess predictors of early newborn deaths at representative metropolitan referral health facilities in Africa. Materials & MethodsWe designed a prospective, analytical, hospital-based study in neonatal units at Dar es Salaam public regional referral hospitals, Tanzania. Neonates who died within the first 7 days of life were the target population. A pre-designed Case Report Form was the main tool for data collection. Multivariable binary logistic regression model was fitted to account for predictors of early newborn deaths after appropriate linear model validation. Proportion of early newborn deaths was the outcome variable. ResultsWe recruited and analysed 2212 neonate-days of follow-up. Prevalence of early newborn deaths was 28.1%. Birth asphyxia ({chi}2 = 20.4, df =1), preterm delivery ({chi}2= 5.36, df = 1) and respiratory distress syndrome ({chi}2 = 30.94, df = 1) were associated with early neonatal outcomes. Predictors of early newborn deaths were neonatal respiratory rate (Tachypnoea - A.O.R.: 2.28 (95% CI.: 1.44 - 5.79); Bradypnoea - A.O.R.: 1.9 (95% C.I.: 1.02 - 12.3) and gestational age (Preterm delivery - A.O.R.: 1.48, 95% CI.: 1.11 - 2.09 and Post-term delivery - A.O.R.: 5.05, 95% C.I.: 4.49 - 32.0). ConclusionsEarly newborn deaths rate was relatively high in this study population. Newborns respiratory rates and gestational age at delivery were significant clinical factors associated with early newborn deaths in this study.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.