How COVID-19 vaccination in England varied by geography, demography, deprivation and registry: Bayesian ecological modelling
Dropkin, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccines were freely available in England through the NHS with initial rollout from late 2020, but uptake was highly variable by local geography. Do census variables and deprivation explain the variation in uptake? MethodsMiddle Super Output Area level data for 1st and 2nd Primaries (P1, P2) and Booster / 3rd Injection (B3I) was obtained from the COVID-19 Dash-board. Covariate sources included Census 2021, the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), flu vaccination, the EU Referendum, military bases and prisons, and the ratio of the vaccine registry to the Census population aged 12+ which was des-ignated VRx. A Bayesian multilevel beta-binomial model including factors for lower tier local authority nested within region was fitted to the uptake. Leave-one-out methods were used to measure the impact of model terms and groups and identify possible outliers. ResultsThe model passed Bayesian tests for convergence and fit the data well with few outliers. P1 uptake was the key predictor of P2, which predicted B3I. Regional and Local Authority factors and interaction of IMD with VRx had strong impacts on P1. The area proportions of various ethnicities, younger age, international migration, voting to "Leave" the EU, and declining census ques-tions on religion or sexual orientation, were all negative predictors of P1 uptake. Amongst ethnicities the "Other White" group had the strongest impact. The "random effects" for London and the South West were credibly higher than those for North West or North East. Differences between the ten highest and lowest nested local authority effects were credible and generally larger than regional differences. ConclusionsModelling can adjust for uncertainty in Vaccine Register data. Vaccination pandemic planning should prioritise the initial phase. Distrust is a credible predictor. Ethnic minorities and in particular "Other White" com-munities and international migrants need active outreach to overcome barriers including language and the Hostile Environment. Local authority effects and out-liers may reflect differences in NHS and public health strategy and capacity to offer relevant provision during the most critical period of vaccination, its outset.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in English Covid booster uptake 98%
- Predicting willingness to be vaccinated for Covid-19: evidence from New Zealand 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Recurrent Reinforced Learning model to compare the efficacy of targeted local vs. national measures on the spread of COVID-19 in the UK 95%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 94%
- Development and validation of an algorithm to estimate the risk of severe complications of COVID-19 to prioritise vaccination 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Role of Modelling and Analytics in South African COVID-19 Planning and Budgeting 93%
- Predicting Mobile Health Clinic Utilization for COVID-19 Vaccination in South Carolina: A Statistical Framework for Strategic Resource Allocation 93%
- Evolving Patterns of COVID-19 Mortality in US Counties: A Longitudinal Study of Healthcare, Socioeconomic, and Vaccination Associations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework 94%
- Modelling of COVID-19 vaccination strategies and herd immunity, in scenarios of limited and full vaccine supply in NSW, Australia 93%
- Exploring the role of mass immunisation in influenza pandemic preparedness: a modelling study for the UK context 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.