Upregulation of a novel lncRNA KLHDC7B-DT in Head and Neck Cancers: Implications for Prognosis and Molecular Mechanisms
Sur, S.; Davray, D.; Basu, S.; Gupta, S.; Kheur, S.; Rudagi, B. M.
Show abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC), the seventh most frequent malignancy globally, is a serious health concern. Despite advancements in treatment, the overall survival rate for HNC remains around 50%, with even poorer outcomes in metastatic cases. This highlights the urgent need to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying HNC for improved diagnostics and therapies. The importance of non-coding RNAs, especially long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), in a variety of malignancies, including HNC, has been highlighted in recent researches. Although lncRNAs and mRNA are very similar, lncRNAs do not encode proteins and they are longer than 200 nucleotides. While studies have implicated lncRNAs in several cancers, including HNC, their exact role in HNC remains unclear, and there are currently no clinically established lncRNA biomarkers for diagnosis or therapy. Thus, this study aims to identify novel lncRNAs and investigate their significance in HNC. For this, we looked over recent research and discovered a new lncRNA called KLHDC7B-DT. The KLHDC7B-DT is significantly upregulated in HNC patient samples, and this result is corroborated by TCGA HNC data and cell lines. Further investigation suggests that KLHDC7B-DT may be linked with cancer stage, grade, age, and worse patient survival. We identified potential miRNAs that interact with KLHDC7B-DT and presented mRNA targets of these miRNAs, along with their possible functions. We propose that KLHDC7B-DT may regulate IL-6 expression in HNC, either through miRNAs or alternative mechanisms. Additionally, we found a significant positive correlation between the neighboring protein-coding gene KLHDC7B and the KLHDC7B-DT in HNC, both of which are significantly upregulated in HNC. In conclusion, KLHDC7B-DT is upregulated in HNC and holds promise as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker. This study marks the first report highlighting the significance of KLHDC7B-DT in HNC.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Glyoxalase 1: emerging biomarker and therapeutic target in cervical cancer progression 95%
- Expression of Spred2 in the urothelial tumorigenesis of the urinary bladder 94%
- Selection of internal references for transcriptomics and RT-qPCR assays in Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) related Schwann cell lines 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- FOXO1 mitigates the SMAD3/FOXL2C134W Transcriptomic Effect in a Model of Human Adult Granulosa Cell Tumor 93%
- Spatial tumour gene signature discriminates neoplastic from non-neoplastic compartments in colon cancer: unravelling predictive biomarkers for relapse 92%
- Panomics reveals patient-individuality as the major driver for colorectal cancer progression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- MAP Kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin are main pathways of gallbladder carcinogenesis: Results from bioinformatic analysis of Next Generation Sequencing data from a hospital-based cohort. 94%
- Tissue micro-RNAs associated with colorectal cancer prognosis: a systematic review 92%
- Transcription factors involved in stem cell maintenance are downstream of Slug/Snail2 and repressed by TGF-β in bronchial basal stem/progenitor cells from COPD 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- COL7A1 expression improves prognosis prediction for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma atop of stage 94%
- Loss of CHGA protein as a potential biomarker for colon cancer diagnosis: a study on biomarker discovery by machine learning and confirmation by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer tissue microarrays 94%
- Development of a Single Molecule Counting Assay to Differentiate Chromophobe Renal Cancer and Oncocytoma in Clinics 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.