Back

Flexible brain state engagement predicts cognitive control transdiagnostically

Ye, J.; Mehta, S.; Khaitova, M.; Arora, J.; Tokoglu, F.; Hahn, C. A.; Lacadie, C.; Greene, A. S.; Constable, R. T.; Scheinost, D.

2025-12-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.11.30.691395 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive control supports adaptive responses in an ever-changing world. While alterations in cognitive control have been consistently observed in a range of psychiatric disorders, the neural mechanisms giving rise to this behavioral variation remain elusive. Here, we tested whether the ability to flexibly recruit recurring brain activation patterns (i.e., brain states) may serve as an intermediate phenotype supporting cognitive control in individuals with a spectrum of clinical symptoms. We leveraged machine learning and external validation to explore this question in three independent, transdiagnostic datasets (N>600), including participants with anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, mood disorder, substance use disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and neurodevelopmental disorder. To capture the multifaceted nature of cognitive control, we assessed two of its components, inhibition and shift, using both task-based and questionnaire data. Flexible brain state engagement predicted all cognitive control metrics in previously unseen individuals transdiagnostically, regardless of which dataset was used for model training. Connectome-based predictive modeling also revealed that shared brain networks underpinned flexible brain state engagement in a transdiagnostic manner. Leveraging brain network dynamics, we further observed that moments of more flexible brain state engagement aligned with moments of network connectivity related to better cognitive control within the same individual. This temporal alignment was replicated in all three datasets with heterogeneous samples. Altogether, this study provides robust evidence that flexible engagement of brain state may support both inter- and intra-individual differences in cognitive control across individuals with diverse mental health profiles. Funding sources F31AA032179; R01MH121095

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.2%
3
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
6
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
9
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
21
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
25
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%