Fully Automated Deep Learning Based Pipeline for Evans Index Measurement from Raw 3D MRI
shirzadeh barough, s.; Bilgel, M.; Moghekar, A.; Ventura, C.; Luciano, M. G.; Moghekar, A.
Show abstract
Ventriculomegaly is a key neuroimaging feature in conditions such as normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and other disorders of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. The Evans Index (EI), defined as the ratio of the maximal frontal horn width to the maximal inner skull diameter, remains a simple and widely used marker for ventricular enlargement. However, manual EI measurement is subject to observer variability and dependent on proper alignment to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure (AC-PC) plane, limiting reproducibility in large-scale and multi-center studies. We present a fully automated deep learning-based pipeline for EI calculation directly from raw T1-weighted MPRAGE MRI scans. The pipeline integrates (i) landmark detection using the BrainSignsNet model, (ii) rigid AC-PC alignment, and (iii) robust segmentation of the lateral ventricles (LV) and intracranial volume (ICV) via nnU-Net models, including a custom ventricular network trained on 1,300 annotated scans enriched for hydrocephalus. The Evans Index is then derived from automated measurement of frontal horn width and inner skull diameter at the aligned axial slice. Internal validation using data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, BIOCARD, and Johns Hopkins cohorts demonstrated high segmentation accuracy (Dice coefficient = 0.98). External validation on the PENS trial, including pre- and post-shunt NPH scans, showed excellent agreement with expert manual EI measurements (mean bias = 0.0068, mean absolute error = 0.0103, r = 0.96, p < 0.001). Bias analyses revealed no significant association between measurement error and age, sex, or ventricular volume This fully automated, orientation-standardized method achieves accurate and reproducible Evans Index measurement across diverse MRI datasets. By eliminating manual intervention, the pipeline enhances scalability for large neuroimaging cohorts and provides a reliable tool for clinical assessment, screening and monitoring of ventriculomegaly, especially in NPH.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for reduced choroid plexus volume in the aged brain 94%
- Impact of infusion conditions and anesthesia on CSF tracer dynamics in mouse brain 91%
- Cognitive assessment methods and outcomes following shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH): a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 94%
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction 94%
- Lesion aware automated processing pipeline for multimodal neuroimaging stroke data and The Virtual Brain (TVB) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 94%
- Image processing approaches to enhance perivascular space visibility and quantification using MRI 93%
- An AI-based segmentation and analysis pipeline for high-field MR monitoring of cerebral organoids 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spinal cord MRI and MRS Detect Early-stage Alterations and Disease Progression in Friedreich Ataxia 94%
- Machine learning-based prediction of motor status in glioma patients using diffusion MRI metrics along the corticospinal tract 93%
- In vivo myelin imaging and tissue microstructure in white matter hyperintensities and perilesional white matter 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases 94%
- Subcortical Segmentation of the Fetal Brain in 3D Ultrasound using Deep Learning 93%
- Quality control strategies for brain MRI segmentation and parcellation: practical approaches and recommendations - insights from The Maastricht Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.