Single-Cell Mendelian Randomization Identifies Cell-Type Specific Genetic Drivers of Lung Cancer Subtypes
Yang, Q.; Yan, C.; Wang, X.-f.
Show abstract
BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many loci linked to lung cancer, but connecting these loci to causal genes and relevant cell types remains difficult. Traditional Mendelian randomization (MR) using bulk tissue eQTLs averages signals across diverse cells, masking cell-specific effects. Here, we apply single-cell eQTL based MR to infer causal relationships at immune-cell resolution, revealing mechanisms not detectable in bulk analyses. MethodsWe conducted single-cell cis-eQTL MR across multiple immune cell subtypes to identify genes causally linked to lung cancer subtypes, including non-small cell lung cancer, further classified into adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell lung cancer. Sensitivity and colocalization analyses confirmed shared genetic variants driving both expression and cancer risk. Bulk-tissue MR was conducted to see if the single-cell positive genes also show significance in whole blood and lung tissue. Phenome-wide MR (PheMR) further assessed pleiotropic associations across complex traits. ResultsSingle-cell Mendelian Randomization (scMR) uncovered 375 cell-type specific causal links between gene expression and lung cancer subtypes. Colocalization confirmed shared causal variants in 35 gene-cell combinations. Cross-tissue validation highlighted five consistent genes--HSPA1B, HLA-DOA, GPX1, ZP3, and CORO1B. PheMR revealed these genes additional associations with other diseases, suggesting broader functional relevance. ConclusionsThe scMR workflow provides a high-resolution causal map of lung cancer susceptibility within immune contexts. The results nominate HSPA1B, HLA-DOA, GPX1, ZP3, and CORO1B as promising candidates for mechanistic and translational follow-up, demonstrating the power of single-cell causal inference in uncovering disease mechanisms obscured in bulk analyses.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of functional genomics and statistical fine-mapping systematically characterizes adult-onset and childhood-onset asthma genetic associations 94%
- Burden of tumor mutations, neoepitopes, and other variants are dubious predictors of cancer immunotherapy response and overall survival 94%
- Multi-scale characterisation of homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Cancer Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for 17 Cancer Types in Two Large Cohorts 95%
- Context-aware single-cell multiome approach identified cell-type specific lung cancer susceptibility genes 95%
- A pan-cancer analysis of CpG Island gene regulation reveals extensive plasticity within Polycomb targets 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional genomics implicates natural killer cells as potential key drivers in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis 94%
- Pleiotropy-guided transcriptome imputation from normal and tumor tissues identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast and ovarian cancer 92%
- Evaluation of imputation performance of multiple reference panels in a Pakistani population 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Cell eQTL Mapping Reveals Cell Type-Specific Genetic Regulation in Lung Cancer 93%
- Leveraging global multi-ancestry meta-analysis in the study of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis genetics 92%
- Systematic single-variant and gene-based association testing of 3,700 phenotypes in 281,850 UK Biobank exomes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.