Glycosylation-Modulated Conformational Diversity in Neurotrophin Receptors
Tsengenes, A.; Athanasiou, C.; Wade, R. C.
Show abstract
Glycosylation is a widespread modification of cell-surface receptors, yet its structural impact is often overlooked due to the difficulty of experimentally characterizing glycans. Glycosylation of neurotrophin receptors has been reported to affect their localization and function. To investigate the effects of glycosylation of the extracellular domains (ECDs) of p75, TrkA, and TrkB neurotrophin receptors, we modeled their ECDs in glycosylated and non-glycosylated states and carried out molecular dynamics simulations of monomeric and dimeric forms of the ECDs with and without a neurotrophin bound. The single N-glycan on the p75 ECD provided minimal shielding and had limited interaction with the neurotrophin, although glycan-glycan contacts between the two p75 monomers may influence the stability of the receptor-neurotrophin complex. In contrast, TrkA and TrkB carry multiple N-glycans that shield the ECDs much more and, particularly for TrkB, increase the contact area between the receptor and the neurotrophin. The p75 ECD was comparatively rigid, independent of glycosylation state, likely due to its extensive network of disulfide bonds. In contrast, without glycans, the TrkA and TrkB ECDs tended to collapse inwards, sometimes obstructing the neurotrophin binding site. Glycosylation of TrkA and TrkB prevented bending of the ECD into more compact states, and instead promoted extended conformations that better accommodate neurotrophin binding. Overall, the simulations reveal distinct, receptor-specific roles of glycosylation in modulating neurotrophin receptor shielding, flexibility, and conformation, with effects on neurotrophin binding. Statement of significanceNeurotrophins are proteins that promote neuronal survival. Their binding to the extracellular domains of transmembrane receptors leads to signal transduction intracellularly. Glycosylation of some neurotrophin receptors has been reported to affect their localization and function but the mechanism is unclear. We investigate the effects of glycosylation on the structure, dynamics and binding properties of the extracellular domains of three neurotrophin receptors by molecular dynamics simulation. We identify distinct receptor-specific effects of glycosylation. In particular, we find that glycosylation of tyrosine receptor kinases prevents concealment of the neurotrophin binding site due to receptor dynamics and favors a more extended receptor conformation, thereby supporting neutrophin binding and the associated signal transduction.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effects of N-linked Glycosylation on SLC6 Transporters 96%
- Deep Mutational Scanning of Dynamic Interaction Networks in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Complexes: Allosteric Hotspots Control Functional Mimicry and Resilience to Mutational Escape 96%
- Selective Activation of GPCRs: Molecular Dynamics Shows Siponimod Binds but Fails to Activate S1PR2 Unlike S1PR1 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Assessment of Different Structural Models for Claudin-5 Complexes in Blood-Brain-Barrier Tight-Junctions 94%
- Binding and activation of serotonergic G-protein coupled receptors by the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine. 94%
- Distinct Binding Mechanisms for Allosteric Sodium Ion In Cannabinoid Receptors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular Dynamics Analysis of a Flexible Loop at the Binding Interface of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Receptor-Binding Domain 96%
- Multi-state Modeling of G-protein Coupled Receptors at Experimental Accuracy 96%
- Computational elucidation of possible contributors to formation and stabilization of ATP-lid down-conformation in the N-terminal domain of Hsp90 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.