Back

Overcoming EGFR resistance by monovalent and bident inhibitors targeting Cys775

Li, Z.; Jiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Ficarro, S. B.; Collins, S. J.; Beyett, T. S.; Schaeffner, I. K.; Tavares, I.; Gottlieb, F. H.; Suda, D.; Gokhale, P. C.; Black-Holmes, L. M.; Gazgalis, D.; Eck, M. J.; Janne, P. A.; Marto, J. A.; Che, J.; Gray, N. S.; Zhang, T.

2025-12-02 cancer biology
10.64898/2025.11.28.691243 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Covalent targeting of EGFR cysteine 797 by osimertinib is one of the most successful breakthroughs in targeted therapy, fundamentally transforming the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, resistance driven by mutation of C797 remains a major clinical challenge. Developing novel covalent strategies beyond C797 targeting presents a compelling opportunity for next-generation EGFR inhibitors. We first demonstrated that cysteine 775, located deep within the ATP-binding pocket, is accessible by a rationally designed covalent molecule ZNL-3, which as the first-in-class covalent cysteine 775 inhibitor exhibited strong efficacy in osimertinib-resistant mouse models. To further enhance resilience to resistance-causing mutations, we developed a dual-warhead, bident compound--YNW-1--which covalently targets both cysteine 775 and 797 simultaneously. YNW-1 is the first intramolecular lock to exhibit balanced reactive efficiency on both cysteines, rendering single-site mutations ineffective to confer resistance. The discovery of ZNL-3 and YNW-1 represents significant advancements in EGFR-targeted drug development, and further optimization toward clinical translation is a worthwhile strategy. SIGNIFICANCE: This study establishes the therapeutic potential of an EGFR covalent inhibitor through unprecedented targeting of cysteine 775 and provides the first demonstration that dual cysteine engagement offers superior efficacy over conventional covalent inhibitors by delaying resistance.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.