Back

Isolation of extracellular vesicles from pleural effusion of patients with lung cancer for downstream application in the clinical setting

Vukovic, M.; Filipovic, L.; Petrovic, N.; Zecevic, A.; Kosanovic, M.; Tanic, M.; Jankovic, R.; Stanojkovic, T.; Popovic, M.; Korac, A.; Stevanovic, S.; Cavic, M.

2025-12-02 oncology
10.64898/2025.11.28.25341238 medRxiv
Show abstract

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common clinical manifestation of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and represents a valuable source of tumor-derived components, including extracellular vesicles (EVs). The aim of this study was to compare three different EV enrichment methods with potential applicability in clinical practice: a commercial Norgen kit (NOR), immunoaffinity capture (IA), and ultracentrifugation (UC). Following EV characterization, IA demonstrated the best overall performance in terms of EV yield and purity, NOR showed intermediate efficiency, while UC was the least effective method. The IA method exhibited characteristics suitable for potential clinical implementation, whereas NOR and UC may require combination with additional enrichment approaches. Advancing pleural effusion-based liquid biopsy toward clinical application will depend on the development of robust, scalable, and user-friendly EV enrichment workflows, along with harmonized guidelines for sample collection, preprocessing, and data reporting. Establishing such standards will enhance reproducibility, enable meaningful cross-study comparisons, and accelerate the integration of EV-based biomarkers into precision oncology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Extracellular Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
3
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
6
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
11
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
13
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Molecular Cancer
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
19
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%