Back

Research Letter: Childhood Adversity and Risk of Subsequent Head and Neck Injury: an ABCD Cohort Analysis

Jain, D.; Carlsson, E.; de Souza, N. L.

2025-12-02 neurology
10.64898/2025.11.28.25341166 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study examined whether baseline reports of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and early life adversity (ELA) were associated with subsequent head/neck injury or probable brain injury in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study(R) cohort. SettingABCD Study(R) cohort ParticipantsABCD Study(R) data release 5.0 provided baseline and partial longitudinal data through Year 4. Inclusion required at least one follow-up timepoint, data to compute the ACEs or ELA score, sex, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis status. The final sample included 10,853 participants for ACEs analyses and 10,850 ELA analyses. DesignProspective observational design. Main MeasuresHead and/or neck injuries and probable brain injuries were assessed using the caregiver-reported Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method Short Form. We used previously published recommendations for the ABCD study to calculate a proxy ACEs score and a broader measure of ELA using both caregiver and youth report at baseline. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, primary caregiver education, childs history of ADHD, report of head/neck or probable brain injury at baseline, and broken bone injury at baseline or follow-up were covariates in logistic regression models examining the association between risk of head/neck injury or probable brain injury with ACEs or ELA. ResultsExposure to more adversity (ACES: Odds Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] OR[95%CI]=0.04[0.001,0.08]; ELA: OR[95%CI]=0.05[0.01,0.08]) was associated with higher odds of sustaining a head or neck injury at any of the follow-up time points but not of probable brain injury (ACES: OR[95%CI]=0.002[-0.08,0.08]; ELA: OR[95%CI]=0.01[-0.06,0.07]). ConclusionLimited public knowledge of and reliance on caregiver report of head/neck injury increases misclassification bias and underscores the need for improved education and measurement strategies. We observed a stronger association between ELA and head/neck injury, potentially reflecting differences in disclosure and awareness rather than due to types of exposure.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.5%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
4
Pediatric Neurology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
8
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
9
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
12
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
JCPP Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
15
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Psychoneuroendocrinology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
JAMA Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.6%
29
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%