Back

Does symptom perception after negative affect induction differ between physically ill and healthy individuals? An experimental study within SOMA.CK

Jessen, B.; Schmidt-Lauber, C.; Huber, T. B.; Loewe, B.; Van den Bergh, O.; Witthoeft, M.; Shedden-Mora, M.

2025-12-06 nephrology
10.64898/2025.11.27.25341154
Show abstract

IntroductionSymptom perception is highly subjective and influenced by the complex interplay of biopsychosocial factors. This study aimed to explore whether negative affect induction using the Affect and Symptoms Paradigm (ASP) influences symptom perception in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) and healthy controls. MethodsParticipants watched three picture series with varying affective content (positive, negative, neutral) from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). After each picture set, participants rated symptom levels (10-item symptom checklist), affective state (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) and arousal levels (Self-Assessment-Manikin-System). ResultsIn N = 115 individuals with ND-CKD from the SOMA.CK study (mean age = 62.95, SD = 12.60) and 100 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (mean age = 60.00, SD = 12.80) negative pictures significantly increased negative affectivity and arousal. All participants reported significantly higher symptom levels after negative versus positive and neutral pictures. No significant group differences in overall symptom levels emerged. Habitual symptoms did not moderate symptom levels after negative affect induction, although high habitual symptom reporters showed higher symptom levels across all picture categories. In the CKD group symptom levels were moderated by difficulties in identifying feelings and in controls by suppression as emotion regulation strategy. ConclusionNegative affect induction increases symptom levels, even in a chronic illness such as CKD. These results are in line with the predictive processing model which suggests that symptom perception develops from a complex inferential process of somatosensory input in light of pre-existing symptom representations in memory (priors). HighlightsO_LIPatients with ND-CKD and healthy controls reported higher symptom levels after negative pictures C_LIO_LIHabitual symptoms did not moderate symptom levels after negative pictures C_LIO_LIDifficulties in identifying feelings moderated symptom levels in the CKD group C_LIO_LISuppression moderated symptom levels in the HC group C_LIO_LISymptoms after negative pictures predicted CKD-specific symptom burden at 6 months C_LI

Matching journals

1
BMC Nephrology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
#1
244× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 19%
1.5× avg
3
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Elsevier BV · based on 10 published papers
#1
237× avg
4
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.3%
89× avg
5
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 36%
5.1%
6
Kidney International Reports
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.5%
72× avg
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 3%
5.7× avg
8
Kidney360
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.8%
31× avg
9
Kidney International
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.7%
49× avg
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 4%
5.5× avg
11
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 27 published papers
Top 2%
8.1× avg
12
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 5%
4.3× avg
13
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 18%
0.9%
14
American Journal of Transplantation
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.6%
18× avg
15
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 5%
4.4× avg
16
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 22 published papers
Top 3%
7.3× avg
17
Journal of Affective Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 72 published papers
Top 6%
1.9× avg
18
Biology Methods and Protocols
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 19 published papers
Top 3%
6.5× avg
19
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 17 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
20
DIGITAL HEALTH
SAGE Publications · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 11%
0.8%