Back

A stomatal model of anatomical tradeoffs between photosynthesis and pathogen defense

Muir, C. D.

2019-12-11 plant biology
10.1101/871228 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stomatal pores control both leaf gas exchange and are one route for infection of internal plant tissues by many foliar pathogens, setting up the potential for tradeoffs between photosynthesis and defense. Anatomical shifts to lower stomatal density and/or size may also limit pathogen colonization, but such developmental changes could permanently reduce the gas exchange capacity for the life of the leaf. I developed and analyzed a spatially explicit model of pathogen colonization on the leaf as a function of stomatal size and density, anatomical traits which partially determine maximum rates of gas exchange. The model predicts greater stomatal size or density increases the probability of colonization, but the effect is most pronounced when the fraction of leaf surface covered by stomata is low. I also derived scaling relationships between stomatal size and density that preserves a given probability of colonization. These scaling relationships set up a potential anatomical conflict between limiting pathogen colonization and minimizing the fraction of leaf surface covered by stomata. Although a connection between gas exchange and pathogen defense has been suggested empirically, this is the first mathematical model connecting gas exchange and pathogen defense via stomatal anatomy. A limitation of the model is that it does not include variation in innate immunity and stomatal closure in response to pathogens. Nevertheless, the model makes predictions that can be tested with experiments and may explain variation in stomatal anatomy among plants. The model is generalizable to many types of pathogens, but lacks significant biological realism that may be needed for precise predictions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.8%
2
Quantitative Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.1%
4
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
5
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
6
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
7
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
in silico Plants
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
9
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
10
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
12
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
13
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
16
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.1%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
20
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
22
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%