Back

Widespread interaction between ADAR1 and transcriptional byproducts

Wu, C. S.; Tang, S. J.; Tan, H. K.; Hung, L.-Y.; Teo, W. W.; Li, J.; An, O.; Tan, K. T.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, L.; Tenen, D. G.; Yang, H.

2019-12-11 genomics
10.1101/870782 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundADAR1, an adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing enzyme, has an emerging role in cancer immunotherapy. ADAR1 presumably works by suppressing cellular innate immunity response to endogenously generated double-stranded RNAs through RNA editing. However, RNA species that are directly regulated by ADAR1 mediated RNA editing processes remain poorly defined. ResultsIn this study, we used a novel bioinformatics approach to track ADAR1-RNA interactions. By integrating DNA-seq, RNA-seq, and ADAR1 RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (fRIP-seq) data of K562 cell line, we provided the first in-situ landscape profiling of ADAR1 RNA binding and editing activities. With long RNA fragments captured by ADAR1 immunoprecipitation, we were able to identify exon junctions and genomic boundaries used by ADAR1-associated RNAs and thus we could possibly trace pre-RNA processing steps that had been acting on them. Our methodology allowed us to acquire the knowledge of transcriptome-wide scenario of ADAR1 activities. Intriguingly, we found that ADAR1 had a tendency to interact with transcriptional byproducts originated from obscure regions such as introns and intergenic regions. ConclusionsOur observation might shed light on the dual role of ADAR1 proteins not only in diversifying the transcriptome, but also in reigning RNA debris from obscure regions. Moreover, as the functional potential of seemly transcriptional byproducts is just beginning to emerge, this study would bridge ADAR1 with other fields of RNA biology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.