Back

Development and clinical validation of a targeted RNAseq panel (Fusion-STAMP) for diagnostic and predictive gene fusion detection in solid tumors

Nohr, E.; Kunder, C. A.; Jones, C.; Sutton, S.; Fung, E.; Zhu, H.; Feng, S. J.; Gojenola, L.; Bustamante, C.; Zehnder, J. L.; Costa, H. A.

2019-12-10 genomics
10.1101/870634 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA sequencing is emerging as a powerful technique to detect a diverse array of fusions in human neoplasia, but few clinically validated assays have been described to date. We designed and validated a hybrid-capture RNAseq assay for FFPE tissue (Fusion-STAMP). It fully targets the transcript isoforms of 43 genes selected for their known impact as actionable targets of existing and emerging anti-cancer therapies (especially in lung adenocarcinomas), prognostic features, and/or utility as diagnostic cancer biomarkers (especially in sarcomas). 57 fusion results across 34 samples were evaluated. Fusion-STAMP demonstrated high overall accuracy with 98% sensitivity and 94% specificity for fusion detection. There was high intra- and inter-run reproducibility. Detection was sensitive to approximately 10% tumor, though this is expected to be impacted by fusion transcript expression levels, hybrid capture efficiency, and RNA quality. Challenges of clinically validating RNA sequencing for fusion detection include a low average RNA quality in FFPE specimens, and variable RNA total content and expression profile per cell. These challenges contribute to highly variable on-target rates, total read pairs, and total mapped read pairs. False positive results may be caused by intergenic splicing, barcode hopping / index hopping, or misalignment. Despite this, Fusion-STAMP demonstrates high overall performance metrics for qualitative fusion detection and is expected to provide clinical utility in identifying actionable fusions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
3
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
11
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
12
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
20
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
23
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%