Reward modulates behaviour and neural responses in motor cortex during action observation
Cretu, A. L.; Lehner, R.; Polania, R.; Wenderoth, N.
Show abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies demonstrated that observing the actions of other individuals leads to action-specific facilitation of primary motor cortex (M1) (i.e., "motor resonance"). Motor resonance is modulated by contextual information accompanying others actions, however, it is currently unknown whether action value influences behavioural and physiological outcomes during action observation in humans. Here we tested whether response times (RT) and muscle-specific changes of M1 excitability are modulated by the value an observer assigns to the action executed by another agent and whether this effect can be distinguished from attentional engagement. We show that observing highly-valued actions leads to a significant decrease in RT variability and a significant strengthening of action-specific neural representations in M1. This "sharpening" of behavioural and neural responses was observed over and beyond a control task requiring similar attentional engagement but did not include any rewards. Our finding that reward influences action specific representations in human M1 even if no motor response is required is new, suggesting that reward influences the transformation of action stimuli from the perceptual to the motor domain. We suggest that premotor areas are important for mediating the observed effect, most likely by optimizing grasp-specific PMv-M1 interactions which cause muscular facilitation patterns in M1 to be more distinct for rewarded actions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- No evidence for somatosensory attenuationduring action observation of self-touch 96%
- Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect 96%
- Rapid integration of face detection and task set in visually guided reaching 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Interference between flexible and adaptive reaching control 96%
- The bodily appearance of a virtual partner affects the activity of the action observation and action monitoring systems in a minimally interactive task 95%
- Visual uncertainty unveils the distinct role of haptic cues in multisensory grasping 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reward-driven enhancements in motor control are robust to TMS manipulation 97%
- Object motion influences feedforward motor responses during mechanical stopping of virtual projectiles: A preliminary study 94%
- Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.