Back

A naturally segregating polymorphism balancing semelparous reproduction versus reproductive diapause revealed via microfluidic assessment of starvation stress in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Archer, H.; Banse, S.; Blue, B.; Phillips, P. C.

2019-12-08 evolutionary biology
10.1101/863878 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans typically feeds on rotting fruit and plant material in a fluctuating natural habitat, a boom-and-bust lifestyle. Moreover, stage specific developmental responses to low food concentration suggest that starvation-like conditions are a regular occurrence. In order to assess variation in the C. elegans starvation response under precisely controlled conditions and simultaneously phenotype a large number of individuals with high precision, we have developed a microfluidic device that, when combined with image scanning technology, allows for high-throughput assessment at a temporal resolution not previously feasible and applied this to a large mapping panel of fully sequenced intercross lines. Under these conditions worms exhibit a markedly reduced adult lifespan with strain-dependent variation in starvation resistance, ranging from <24 hours to [~]120 hours. Genome-wide mapping of the responses of more than 7,855 individuals identified four quantitative trait loci (QTL) of large effects. Three of these loci are associated with single genes (ash-2, exc-6, and dpy-28) and the fourth is a [~]26 KB region on Chromosome V encompassing several genes. Backcross with selection confirmed the effect of the Chromosome V locus. Segregating natural variation for starvation response in this species suggests that different isolates may use different strategies (facultative vivipary versus reproductive diapause) for dealing with extreme food deprivation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 8%
17.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.1%
3
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.2%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
7
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.0%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
14
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%
27
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%