Shuffle-Seq: En masse combinatorial encoding for n-way genetic interaction screens
Dixit, A.; Kuksenko, O.; Feldman, D.; Regev, A.
Show abstract
Genetic interactions, defined as the non-additive phenotypic impact of combinations of genes, are a hallmark of the mapping from genotype to phenotype. However, genetic interactions remain challenging to systematically test given the massive number of possible combinations. In particular, while large-scale screening efforts in yeast have quantified pairwise interactions that affect cell viability, or synthetic lethality, between all pairs of genes as well as for a limited number of three-way interactions, it has previously been intractable to perform the large screens needed to comprehensively assess interactions in a mammalian genome. Here, we develop Shuffle-Seq, a scalable method to assay genetic interactions. Shuffle-Seq leverages the co-inheritance of genetically encoded barcodes in dividing cells and can scale in proportion to sequencing throughput. We demonstrate the technical validity of Shuffle-Seq and apply it to screening for mechanisms underlying drug resistance in a melanoma model. Shuffle-Seq should allow screens of hundreds of millions of combinatorial perturbations and facilitate the understanding of genetic dependencies and drug sensitivities.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A versatile, high-efficiency platform for CRISPR-based gene activation 97%
- Multiplexed single-cell profiling of post-perturbation transcriptional responses to define cancer vulnerabilities and therapeutic mechanism of action 97%
- RNA Transcripts Serve as a Template for Double-Strand Break Repair in Human Cells 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficient combinatorial targeting of RNA transcripts in single cells with Cas13 RNA Perturb-seq 97%
- Mapping single-cell developmental potential in health and disease with interpretable deep learning 97%
- Photoselective sequencing: microscopically-guided genomic measurements with subcellular resolution 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.